DV makes history in Oxford University

Our visit to the world-famous Oxford University Library — called Bodlein Group of Libraries, perhaps the oldest in the world — on July 19, 2006 was one of the most memorable events during our recent month-long lecture tour of England and USA.

Sir Monier Williams founded the Indian Institute Library which is a subscriber of Dalit Voice right from 1984 (DV was started in 1981).

Dr. Simon Lawson of the library, himself a scholar, received us and took us round the ancient building. He showed us bound volumes of DV of each year from 1984 up to 2005. The first three volumes are not there as the Library started subscribing to DV only from 1984. Besides, the library also has 22 out of the about 100 (DSA) books published by us.

We promised to send all the missing books particularly our international award-winning book, Caste-A Nation Within the Nation (2004).

He said in 1984 a student asked the library to subscribe to DV and since then they received every single issue of DV which, he said, was very popular with the students.

After the US Library of Congress in Washington, Bodlein Library is perhaps the world’s second biggest and the most ancient library. The 7-storeyed building of the New Bodlien Library had three floors underground and a collection of 9 million books. The Indian Institute Library is on the top floor.

Fate of Indian libraries: At a time when the Indian libraries are gathering dust, the Oxford Library is not only growing but attracting scholars from all over the world.

The library also had a full set of Dr. Ambedkar’s books.

Nirad Chaudhari, a noted Indian (Bengali) scholar who died in Oxford itself a couple of years ago, was a frequent visitor to the library. Max Muller, who got the whole lot of Brahminical scriptures translated from Sanskrit to English, was also associated with it. Nirad Chaudhary was not liked by the upper caste Indians there because he used to praise the British rule.

Brahminical tricks: Nirad Chaudhuri, in his biography of Max Muller, Scholar Extraordinary (1974, Orient paperback, pp.382), speaks of the development of the Indian library and how Max Muller failed to get the Oxford University Boden Professorship of Sanskrit which went to Monier Williams (1860).

Max Muller, a German who never visited India, fell a prey to Brahminical tricks and did so much to promote their Sanskrit literature what no other scholar had ever done.

Brahmins made full use of Max Muller but finally dumped him, dubbing him a Christian agent.

However, Brahmins exploited Muller to create a mad Western infatuation with Brahminism (called Hinduism). But alas after wasting his whole life on Brahmin literature and glorifying the Brahmin, Muller finally came to the conclusion that Hinduism lacked in humanity.

The Christian church wasted all its time and energy in India trying to convert the Brahmin to Christianity. If only it had devoted half the attention to Untouchables, they could have achieved wonders.

This only proves to what extent Muller, Monier Williams and the whole lot of British orientalists were fooled by the Brahminical bluffs.

Max Muller dies a sad man: Muller’s translation of the “Sacred Books of the East” which ran into bulky 49 volumes finally proved to be a futile exercise and Muller himself died (1900) a sad man.

How we wish the Indian Library in Oxford takes lessons from his life and gets closer to the life of indigenous Indians.

When Dr. Lawson asked our opinion, we said British rule did immense good to the Dalits in particular and other oppressed people. However, after India got “independence” and the Brahminical people started ruling India (1947), Dalits and other oppressed people suffered a lot. Dr. Lawson said they were fully aware of the situation and the role the Dalit Voice played to highlight these issues.

Dr. Ambedkar at Columbia University

Dr. Ambedkar was and is part of the remarkable Columbians list that was prepared in 2004 to celebrate 250 years of Columbia University. His name comes under the third entry in the list. The list is in alphabetical order by last name. Regarding the listing in Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, I am not sure why Dr. Ambedkar is not listed there. Certainly, he deserves to be in that list prominently. You can find Dr. Ambedkar’s name if one did a search under “Untouchables” in the encyclopedia.

<http://c250.columbia.edu/c250_celebrates/remarkable_columbians/bhimrao_ambedkar.html>

An idea needs propagation as much as a plant needs watering., Bhimrao Ambedkar (1891?1956), Founding Father, modern India MA 1915, PhD 1928 LLD 1952 (hon.)

Ambedkar was a leader in the struggle for Indian independence, the architect of the new nation’s constitution, and the champion of civil rights for the 60 million members of the “Untouchable” caste, to which he belonged. He spoke and wrote ceaselessly on behalf of “Untouchables,” but his passion for justice was broad: in 1950 he resigned from his position as the country’s first minister of law when Nehru’s cabinet refused to pass the Women’s Rights Bill. Dr. Ambedkar was committed to maintaining his independence, and many of the positions he staked out in a long and complex relationship with Gandhi” on the future of Hinduism, for example” remain central to debate within Indian society.

Dr. Ambedkar received a scholarship to Columbia from the Maharajah of Baroda. He earned his MA in 1915 and then obtained a DSc at the London School of Economics before being awarded his Columbia PhD in 1927. In 1952, Columbia presented him with an honorary doctorate for his service as “a great social reformer and a valiant upholder of human rights.” In 1995, a bronze bust of Ambedkar was donated to Lehman Library by the Federation of Ambedkarite and Buddhist Organizations of the United Kingdom.

At Columbia, Dr. Ambedkar studied under John Dewey, who inspired many of his ideas about equality and social justice. Dr. Ambedkar later recounted that at Columbia he experienced social equality for the first time. “The best friends I have had in my life,” he told the New York Times in 1930, “were some of my classmates at Columbia and my great professors, John Dewey, James Shotwell, Edwin Seligman, and James Harvey Robinson.”

Revised in January 2004 with help from Professor Sukhadeo Thorat of Jawharlal Nehru University and the Indian Institute of Dalit Studies, New Delhi.

******************

We visited the world-famous Columbia University (New York) on July 12, 2007 where Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar studied, and saw his bronze bust in the Law Dept. Library. There was no other bust, statue or photograph of any other person in the library hall. Dr. Bindu Bhatt, the Librarian hailing from Ranchi, took us round the library. Senior professors at the University remember Dr. Ambedkar and his contribution to the struggle of India’s Untouchables — EDITOR.

Danger of India’s break-up & its Islamisation

INTRODUCTION

India was never a nation. It was always a subcontinent of several warring nations unlike today’s China which can be called a nation with about 95% of the people belonging to one single (Han) nationality.

The British who ruled us knew this greatest weakness of India and had devised several mechanisms to keep the different warring nationalities fairly satisfied. The British India had the separate electorate to different nationalities doing so much good to the weaker sections. India was not even one single state (country), not to speak of one single nation. Even when the British were ruling, India had several autonomous kingdoms – most prominent being Hyderabad state under the Nizams. Mysore state was another kingdom. The Indian subcontinent had several religions – Islam, Hinduism, Christianity, Sikhism, Parsees, and hundreds of castes and tribes. The north-eastern part of India under seven states today is completely Mongoloid tribal who never considered themselves part of India.

THREE PRINCIPAL SEGMENTS

With the exit of British (1947) the sub-continent broke into India and Pakistan and later the Bengali-speaking Muslims broke away from Pakistan to form their own Bangladesh.

India cannot be understood properly unless we know its population composition which are kept a closely guarded secret as today’s micro minority Hindu rulers want to suppress the aspirations of the different nationalities by calling India a Hindu nation.

India can be broadly divided into three principal segments. (See table)

POWER OF CONVERSION

The first segment (65%) comprises the pre-Aryan original inhabitants of India who built the great glorious Indus Valley Civilisation – next only to the Nile Valley civilisation – which the invading Aryan’s completely destroyed.

The second segment, called the “religious minorities”, is also part of the first segment as over 95% of them are converts from the first segment. They sought salvation in the three egalitarian religions like Islam, Christianity and Sikhism and got liberated.

One example to prove the power of religious conversion. The Namashudras (Untouchables) of Bengal have a state of their own (Bangladesh) today because they embraced Islam and today they are a liberated people. If they had not, they too would have been slaves of Hindus like us. The oppressed Dalits were liberated from Hinduism which has sapped the very vitals of the country.

In other words, the people of the second segment are all our brothers. We Dalits, the Black Untouchables of India and the children of Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar, consider Muslims, Christians and Sikhs as our own brothers.

Our only complaint against Muslims, Christians and Sikhs is that after they got liberated they completely forgot us.

For committing this mistake, they are also suffering today and subjected to severe violence by the Hindu rulers.

The third segment is the one which can be called Hindu and their population is just 15% though they claim to be 80% by including the first segment. Our unwillingness to be annexed into the Hindu segment has led to many bloody wars and violence. This war is continuing.

INDIA IS NOT HINDU

The Hindu population is dwindling day by day as Islam and Christianity are attracting the oppressed Dalits and Tribals. The Hindus are warned that the days of their holy Hinduism are numbered.

The problem of multinational India is caused by the tiny 15% Hindus (which is their latest name) who want to impose their hegemony and called India a Hindu nation.

The figures I gave, however, prove the damn lie of the Hindus. In fact the Hindu thrives only on falsehood and false claims.

Today, India has become a country of several warring nationalities because this micro-minority Hindus led by the Brahmins want to impose their hegemony on the 85% of the unwilling nationalities.

JEWS & THE JEWS OF INDIA

China, which became independent two years after India, is today on the top of the world but we Indians are sinking because of this unending war and violence caused by the slavery imposed on our 85% of the Indian population by the Brahminical rulers.

For your information the Brahmins comprising just 3% of the population are the “Jews of India.”

Both have the same racial characteristics and both believe in enslaving the rest of the population.

Both Brahmins and Jews are a race and not a religion.

Lately, both the Jews and the Brahmins have joined hands to become the rulers of the world. They may like to be the rulers of the world but the world is not ready to accept it.

The Brahminical bid to enslave the people of India is not confined to Dalits. Even Muslims, Sikhs and Christians have become victims of this road-roller. Not only that. They even killed their own “Father of the nation”, M.K. Gandhi, who did so much to make Brahmins the rulers of India. When their job was done they did not hesitate to kill Gandhi.

SEPARATE ELECTORATE AS SOLUTION

So, to solve this never-ending problem that has made India the world’s most violent country, we are pressing for separate electorate. The principle behind this is what is in fact separate must be acknowledged to be separate politically.

Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar demanded separate electorate for Dalits and the benevolent British rulers agreed to concede the demand in 1932. But the cunning Gujrati Baniya, M.K. Gandhi, goaded by his Brahmin bosses, went on a fast unto death (but he did not die) and sabotaged our future.

He destroyed the future of Dalits to make the Brahmins the rulers of India. The historic “Poona Pact” once for all sealed our fate and today India’s Untouchables constitute the world’s single largest slave population.

Our question is when the Brahmins are not prepared to compromise on their ethnic identity, why are they trying to convert the 65% non-Hindu original inhabitants into Hindu by destroying our ethnic identity?

PAIN OF MUSLIM, CHRISTIANS AND SIKHS

The Dalits are not Hindu and were never Hindu. Despite the best efforts of Brahmins, the Dalits and the rest have refused to give up their ethnic identity.

The Brahmins have been trying to Hinduise (enslave) us for 3,500 years but they have not succeeded. And they will never succeed.

As the Editor of Dalit Voice, India’s oldest and the largest circulated journal of the entire 85% “Persecuted nationalities denied human rights”, we support the principle of separate electorate to each nationality and also the right to self determination for Sikhs, Kashmiris, North Eastern Mongoloid tribals.

The Muslims, Christians, Sikhs and the Mongoloid tribals are all in great pain. We Dalits share their pain and suffer with them and offer our full support for their struggle of self-determination.

India is not a nation and was never a nation.

India can remain as one single state only when we are all assured of separate electorate and the right to self determination.

Or else, I warn, the country may break into pieces and the 65% SC/ST/BC’s will go over into Islam, Christianity and Sikhism to seek liberation.

(Read India on the Path of Islamisation, Dr. S. Bheemappa, 2006, Rs. 195)

The Great Syrian Christian dilemma

After several decades of theological and philosophical explorations, at last the Syrian Christians who have been dominating India’s both Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches, have realized that it has been a total failure on their part to “liberate” the Dalits, Tribals and the BCs from Hindu slavery.

The Syrians claim that they were converted from Brahmins by St. Thomas in AD 52 when the Aryan Brahmins themselves did not arrive in the ancient Cheranadu (Kerala) until the 8th century AD. Syrians like to say that they were originally Brahmins and hence entitled to rule the Indian churches­ — be it Roman Catholic, Protestant or even the Evangelical.

DHARMARAM MEETING

A four-day “national consultation of philosophers” (June 1-4, 2006) organised by the Dharmaram College, Bangalore, discussed the theme “indigenous philosophizing”. The theme itself seemed to be confusing because the Syrian Christians and other Aryan upper caste Christians had been actually Brahminsing the Indian church calling it of “indianisation”.

It was Dalit Voice which had long back warned the church leaders not to Brahminise the church but the upper caste church leadership did not heed the warning of our Editor. Even churches were constructed resembling Hindu temples.

AGNIVESH POUNDED

The Bangalore meeting strengthened our fears when we saw a noted Brahmin leader, Swami Agnivesh, inaugurating the meeting. Our Editor had a brush with him for ridiculing DV family member and a noted scholar-thinker, Dr. Kancha Ilaiah. Why the Syrians invited this notorious Hindu nazi whose Arya Samaj was against the liberation of Dalits and Tribals from Hinduism?

Some Syrians did not like the Editor’s criticism of Agnivesh but the Editor literally pounded the Telugu Brahmin just as Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar had once cut Gandhi to pieces at the Round Table Conference in London (1932).

CLASH OF IDENTITY

The fundamental question is: How far “indigenous philosophising” is going to challenge the Brahminical philosophy so that Dalits, Tribals and even the more Hinduised OBCs will be liberated? Or will it be another brand of Brahminization of the philosophical thoughts and the world view of the indigenous people of India? The native Indians have a higher value system to which the alien Aryan Brahminical Hindus have been always hostile because of the sharp contradictions between the identities of the Aryans and the Dalits. Where do the Syrian Christians stand?

Why these Christians still want to be known as Syrians when the language Syriac is not in use in their liturgy and worship? Or is this name “Syrian” a camouflage to identify with the Brahmins in India?

The Hindu terrorist organisation (RSS) and its leader K.S. Sudarshan are happy with the Syrians and he has already given a good conduct certificate to the Syrians. For all these years why the Syrians never thought of Dalits? Why this dilemma now? What is the conspiracy behind this move to suddenly “love” the Dalits?

We have every right to suspect this sudden “change of heart” among the Syrian theologians who control the entire Christiandom in India. They control and manufacture “theology”, they possess vast property, excellent institutions and can manipulate foreign funds like their Brahmin cousins.

Syrians no doubt run the best educational institutions but whom are they actually serving? They are serving our enemy and also the enemy of Christianity. How to trust the integrity of the Syrians when they have love affairs with our enemy-oppressors?

WHY THEY OPPOSE CONVERSION?

How far the Syrian Christians (of Kerala), the Goans, the Mangaloreans and other Aryans who became Christians, are really committed to the cause of Christianity and Evangelisation in India? Had they been honest they could have turned India upside down and transformed the entire stinking Hindu rotten society. Why they did not do that? What is the secret?

SALVATION UNDER HINDUISM

We do not deny that there may be some honest Syrians but such of them are only an exception. Can any Syrian Bishop or theologian speak like Dr. K. Rajaratnam? Dr. K. Rajaratnam of the Lutheran Theological College, Madras, is not an ordinary Christian leader. He was the former president of National Christian Council that controls the Protestant Church. He said the mission of the Indian church was to liberate Dalits from the Hindu oppressors. Such a statement did not come from the Syrian “philosophers” at Bangalore.

Both the Catholic and Protestant theologians were fiddling with Dwaita, Advaita, mantra, tantra, moksha, karma, niskamakarma, vedic philosophy etc. Most of the earlier Protestant theologians were either Brahmins or upper castes. They wanted the Christians to believe that there was salvation in Hinduism. But they deliberately forgot that over 85% Indians were and are the victims of Hinduism. Catholic theologians argue that there is much liberative values in the Vedas and the Upanishads.

Only humble suggestion is that they should read the burning thoughts of Babasaheb Ambedkar who is the only philosopher that India has produced.

He said:

Philosophy is no purely theoretic matter. It has practical potentialities. Philosophy has its roots in solving the problems of life... (W&S, Vol-IV, last part-handwritten).

They are unwilling to come out of the Brahminical hold. Why? Is it just to please the Brahmins who are their blood relations or are they deliberately doing it because they do not want to antagonize the Brahmins?

This is the Great Dilemma facing the Syrians. The dilemma is whether to continue with the Brahminical philosophy (is it a philosophy in the right sense?) or come out of it, reject it, throw out of the church and then accept the philosophy of Babasaheb which is pro-people and life-oriented.

JESUS KILLED

Jesus Christ did encounter the Roman rulers and the Jewish Pharasees who are equal to the Brahmins of India. He challenged them and had to die a political death. The dilemma before the Syrians today is whether to propound a theology and philosophy which would inspire the church to declare a war against the most dangerous, anti-human, diabolic Hinduism and save India. If they should accept all the prophets — John the Baptist (who was beheaded), Jesus Christ and their disciples ­—as the model and to have a true indigenous philosophy they should openly accept Babasaheb Ambedkar who is the greatest philosopher, theologian, thinker and a scholar who did not spare any subject on the face of the earth.

Whenever our Editor and Dr. Kancha Ilaiah raised such issues a few Syrians became uncomfortable.

What is the principal contradiction in India? Is it not Brahminical Hinduism? Babasaheb has said that to save India Hinduism/Brahminism should be destroyed. Do the Syrians have the prophetic courage, at least just to follow what Babasaheb has already said? This is the Great Dilemma before the Syrians.

Wanted national reservation act to save Backwards from racist judiciary

A larger bench of the Supreme Court comprising seven judges under the then Chief Justice R.C. Lahoti ruled on Aug.12, 2005 that there shall not be any reservation or govt. quota in the admission of private professional educational institutions of higher learning whether they belong to minority or non-minority institution. There shall be 15% quota in these private professional educational institutions for non-resident Indians (NRI). The management of these institutions shall have unfettered right to impose more fees and the money collected shall be utilized for economically weaker students of the society. These institutions shall have full freedom to determine the procedure of admission as well as to decide fee structure.

HOSTILE TO SOCIAL JUSTICE

Such anti-Backward decisions of the apex court is not only pro-capitalist, pre-industrialist, pro-educational mafia and profiteers but it is totally against the principle of social justice and social equality.

The verdict protected and promoted the interests of few haves and totally neglected the interests of the largest number of havenots (SC/ST/BCs) —deprived since centuries. The Indian higher judiciary once again mercilessly crushed the 85% Backward Classes population in favour of the 15% upper caste haves by totally flouting the clear-cut provisions of the constitution in favour of SC/ST/OBCs. This decision terribly affected the majority population in India —namely the Bahujan Samaj —and once again the judiciary proved its casteist, communal credentials and hatred against the havenots.

In fact, the apex court decision is not astonishing. Because the judiciary is gradually becoming hostile to the principle of social justice. Reservation is an instrument of socio-economic change to establish a society based on egalitarian principles. To certain extent steps were taken towards it by way of giving reservation in jobs as well as in admissions to education. (Judicial Terrorism, DSA-2006).

DISPLEASURE OF THE NATION

But lately the judicial verdicts have been suffering from allergy to reservation. Despite numerous constitutional provisions, the courts under the pretext of judicial review and judicial activism have been going against the human rights of the oppressed.

This is because the judiciary is dominated by the upper castes who do not like SC/ST/BCs entering the mainstream. The courts started giving anti-reservation decisions despite a fait accompli by their predecessor in the judiciary regarding reservation issue. It has been giving highly detrimental decisions which are seriously affecting the oppressed classes.

It is now proved that the judiciary has become a stumbling block in the overall development of the deprived majority of India.

The judiciary came under the influence of anti-reservation racists and it flouted constitutional values, schemes, principles and the concept of welfare state, socialism and ultimately broken the dream of constitution-makers.

Even some legal luminaries, jurists and former judges expressed their reactions and concerns against the decision of the court. Some even went to the extent of committing suicides against the decision of the court. Most of the political parties have expressed strong feelings against the anti-reservation judgments of the Supreme Court. Even Parliament of India took serious cognizance of this decision and the Govt. of India itself expressed its total dissatisfaction and disagreement with the verdict of the apex court.

BID TO ABOLISH RESERVATIONS

That is how the Government decided to bringing legislation with a view to provide reservation in the non-aided private professional educational institutions whether they belong to minority or non-minority. Even the Prime Minister as well as the Human Resources Minister assured Parliament to bring new legislation to provide reservation in private educational institutions.

Over the last two decades, judiciary has been giving anti-reservation decisions. As a result, the larger section of BCs is badly affected by these decisions making them suspect that the higher judiciary is anti-people. The faith of the deprived classes is diminishing in the judicial system.

Under the pretext of judicial power and review it is making every effort to abolish reservation permanently from both education and employment. The judiciary is getting full support of the upper caste to crush the human rights of over 85% of the deprived population (Bahujan Samaj).

Reservation is a vital instrument of social change provided in the constitution to help the larger section of the society to enter the “mainstream” of the nation and strengthen nation-building. Despite all the hostility of the upper caste, the Backward population was getting some benefit though slowly. But these developments were not tolerated by the racist upper caste rulers.

LONE DALIT JUDGE

To teach a lesson to the Backwards these racists finally found a big support in the higher judiciary which itself is almost 100% upper caste.

When the Backward population is about 85%, which is a social reality, Supreme Court ruled that reservation should not be above 50%. The judiciary virtually ousted reservation from government and semi-government services and admission in the private professional educational institutions. The worst affected field of reservation is education, strategically the most important.

When there are lakhs of vacant posts, under the influence of anti-reservation racists, the judiciary hatched a conspiracy by abolishing reservation applying traditional and illogical criteria.

Even after 59 years of “independence”, except Justice Balakrishnan there is no judge from the Backwards in the Supreme Court. You can imagine what will be the fate of the country with such a racist court presiding over the India. How can it oversee the implementation of the constitution which is so much in favour of the deprived?

QUOTA IN HIGHER JUDICIARY

The then Chief Justice Lahoti of the Supreme Court went to the extent of saying that judiciary has every right to chop the wings of the government and parliament. Hence there is an urgent need to bring a very clear-cut and comprehensive national reservation act through parliament. In this legislation, the reservation, which were denied during last 50 years by the judiciary should be restored whether that be a reservation in government employment or admission in the private professional educational institutions. In order to do social justice, very objective cadre-wise criteria should be applied to reservation instead of post-wise or subject-wise. On the contrary these flimsy criteria of post-wise/subject-wise reservation should be abolished and reservation should be applied at all levels of administration.

The proposed act should extend reservation to the judges of the SC as well as HCs, in all three armed forces (army, navy and air force), vice-chancellors of all universities.

The proposed act should be kept out of judicial scrutiny and by putting it under the Scheduled 9 of the Constitution.

Irrespective of party lines all SC/ST/BC and minority MPs must unite to protect and promote the interests of the Backwards and force the government to introduce a comprehensive reservation act to save the sinking over 85% India’s population. And thereby fulfil the dream of social justice and social equality propounded by Dr. Ambedkar.

********************

D.V. REFERENCE TO BRAHMINICAL JUDICIARY

DV June 16, 2006 p.4: “Supreme court must know the supreme truth”.

DV May 1, 2006 p.25: “Justice: Brahminical style in India”.

DV Oct.1, 2005 p.6: “Who has powers to clip wings of judiciary?”

DV Edit Sept.16, 2005: “We welcome long over due confrontation between judiciary & the legislature” & p. 5: “Supreme court turning into Modern Manu”.

DV July 1, 2005 p.6: “Supreme Court upholds caste-based housing societies”.

DV July 1, 2005 p.25: “Courts blocking Backward Caste reservation in AP”.

DV April 16, 2005 p.4: “Upper castes using judiciary to weaken legislature”.

DV Feb.16, 2005 p.19: “Supreme Court is not supreme”.

DV Dec.1, 2004 p.5: “Amend Constitution to keep courts out of SC/ST quota”.

DV Sept.1, 2003 p.5: “Judiciary is neither honest nor accountable”.

DV Edit Aug.16, 2003: “CMV syndrome afflicts vaidik judges: Their only worry is common civil code — not social justice”.

DV Feb.1, 2003 p.10: “Apex Court bid to curb Muslim education”.

DV Oct.1, 2002 p.17: “Supreme Court finds nothing wrong with Brahminism”.

DV May 16, 2002 p.11: “Govt. rejects quota for Dalits in higher judiciary” & “Chanakya’s acquittal in corruption case”.

DV March 16, 2002 p.7: “How to end judicial corruption”.

DV Feb.16, 2002 p.4: “Parliament must stop Supreme Court from meddling with the will of people” & p. 7: “Unjust Hindu judges warned”.

DV Dec.1, 20001 p.19: “Anti-Dalit Chief Justice retires”.

DV Nov.1, 2000 p.5: “Racism in judiciary”.

Dv Sept.16, 2000 p.7: “Supreme Court practising racism”.

DV Edit Oct.16, 1999: “DV declares war on judicial terrorism: Anti-people Supreme Court”.

DV Oct.16, 1999 p.5: “How dare Supreme Court say quota in PG medicine is anti-national?” & p. 7: “To say Dalit doctors have no merit is clearest case of racism in judiciary”.

DV Oct.1, 1999 p.6: “Dalit protest against Supreme Court”.

DV April 16, 1999 p.17: “Judiciary suffering from Brahminical prejudices”.

DV April 1, 1999 p.6: “MP’s criticise Supreme Court monopoly”.

DV March 16, 1999 p.11: “Dalits furious with Chief Justice Anand”..