Vol 23 December 16th - 31st 2004 No. 24

  Reports
 


Save UN from disaster : EU & China must check US autocratic tyranny

Our Correspondent

Bangalore: The beleaguered United Nations is all set to expand its Security Council and strengthen its structure but the oppressed majority of the world — the Blacks, the Browns and the Yellows (which includes Muslims, Dalits and Chinese) have every reason to say they have no hope in this White Western outfit.

To America, the UN almost died when the warlord of the world, George Bush, killed it and launched his attack on Iraq (1991). Just as in India, where we have the rule of the rich (upper castes), the UN is today choking because of the American arrogance.

The UN was formed in 1945 to save the world from the scourge of war. But how many wars devastated the world since then? The deadliest blow was inflicted on the UN, the only hope of the peace-lovers, when George Bush warned the UN that it was in the danger of "fading into history as an ineffective, irrelevant debating society".

Iraq war to save Israel: The zionist-controlled American President went to the UN Security Council to seek its permission to attack Iraq which, he said, threatened America. But the Security Council said No. America defied the world body, attacked Iraq and thereby inflicted a death blow on the UN. What is the use of expanding the UN Security Council and strengthening its structure when the world's sole super power has all contempt for it? America is threatening UN because it is coming in the way of its aggression against Muslims, Blacks, Browns and Yellows who constitute the single largest population of the world.

Annan calls it "illegal war": The American war against Iraq was illegal. The UN Secretary-General Koffi Annan himself said so. The entire world agrees with Annan. But America says hell with UN.

America says the UN is a nuisance. Nuisance to whom? It is a nuisance to the micro-minority zionists whose sole interest is to protect the illegally established state of Israel by forcibly usupring the land of the Palestinians.

It is to save Israel, Bush was forced by the zionists to wage war in Afghanistan and then Iraq. And the latest is the preparation to attack in Iran on the pretext that it is preparing nuclear bombs.

America might not have won in Afghanistan and faced defeat in Iraq also. But what is the damage caused to the UN and world peace?

Hope in China & European Union: Even within America, there is considerable opposition to the Bush unilateral war. The American puppy, Tom Blair, is also forcing considerable opposition in England. That means barring a micro-minority, the whole world is against the Bush and Blair bid to destroy UN.

The only hope is the regrouping taking place in Europe under the leadership of French President Chirac and the rise of China as a major world power. India too would have become a world power by now but its Brahminical rulers stunted its growth and joined with the US-zionist forces for selfish reasons.

So what is the use of expanding the Security Council and strengthening the UN, when a micro-minority destructive force, armed with its enormous military might, simply destroys the hopes of the people in UN?

The US argument is it has the divine right to launch a pre-emptive war when it is convinced that on humanitarian grounds that such an invasion in necessary. All aggressors use the same language. India's Brahminical forces have been committing all the war and violence on the oppressed Dalits, Muslims and others only in the name of non-violence, justice and peace. The zionist state of Israel is killing the poor, innocent Palestinians using the same jargons. America says it is waging war to introduce democracy and establish human rights in Muslim countries.

Dalits denied justice at Durban: None in the world agrees with America or Israel. Even India's wars in Kashmir were frowned upon by the United Nations. Yet the war-mongers of the world go on chipping and chopping the United Nations which today presents a pathetic picture.

The Dalits of India did not get justice in Durban when it took its case before the UN to establish that India's ruling BSO is indeed practising racism in the name of casteism. Entire African continent is plagued by the different kinds of zionist-inspired White Western conspiracies – the worst being AIDS.
The zionists who invented their "Clash of civilisations" theory (Huntington: Clash of Civilisation, Penguin) to enslave, if not eliminate, the Muslims, Blacks, Browns and Yellows have popularised a new term called "terrorism" which is synonymous with Muslim.

It is learnt the panel to strengthen the UN has come out with an acceptable definition of the word terrorism. But our point is will America and its zionist bosses accept the new definition?

The zionist PM of Israel, Aerial Sharon, says Palestinians are using "terrorism" to kill "innocent" Israelis. But the UN statistics say Israel has killed many more Palestinians. But the Western media, controlled by the zionists, dubs only Palestinians as terrorists but not the Israelis. How can the UN establish the rule of law when might is right?

Western domination: What about forcible Israeli occupation of Palestine? Did not the UN itself condemn the Israeli aggression? Israel has been not only occupying areas after areas belonging to Palestine but systematically killing the Palestinians dubbing them terrorists. But the West is silent. America is openly supporting the Israeli aggression. In the face of such blatant breaking of the UN rule of law, how can the world body survive? The re-election of Bush is a setback to world peace and a threat to UN.

Shift UN from US soil: The problem with the UN is it is not only dominated by the rich White Western countries but controlled by America. Britain with just 60 million population is a veto-wielding permanent Security Council member. But more populous but poorer countries like India, South Africa, Brazil have no say. How can the UN Security Council be a representative body of the world when smaller countries dominate but highly populated countries are ignored?

The UN should represent not the countries but the peoples of those countries. If the peoples must have a voice then the population of a country must be the determining factor in constituting the Security Council.

Even if all these are accepted, still the UN will be ineffective as long as it is located on the soil of America, that too in New York with its heavy zionist influence. The UN headquarters must be shifted out of the American soil and preferably located in Africa, right in the middle of the world.

Menace of veto system: The UN must also bring about changes in its veto system. America uses its veto power whenever a decision goes against its interests. Of particular interest is the case of Israel. The UN is not able to act against Israel, Iraq or any other trouble shot because the US blocks it with its veto power.

This veto system is a menace. Justice to humanity and the world has to be decided on a democratic basis. America uses the pretext of democracy for its every aggression.

So much so it has become the world's most anti-democratic country by misusing its veto power. Just because it has the military might it cannot go on trampling the United Nations.

The UN will continue to be a disaster to the oppressed if it continues to be a toy in the hands of the intoxicated American monkey and its zionist controller.
____________________________________________________

Kanchi: How to save India from vaidik vampire ?
Our Correspondent

Bangalore: The Brahminical Social Order's most notorious vaidik swami — now rotting in the Vellore jail for murdering a fellow Brahmin — has brought terrible shame on the entire vaidik vampire. Never before it faced such a humiliation in "independent" India. This fellow, who went to save Hinduism by harming Dalits, Muslims and Christians etc. and to keep his jati as the ruling class, is today being cursed by the Brahmins themselves as the non-Brahmins are silently enjoying the fun. To the vaidik misfortune, the swami landed in trouble because of an equally notorious vaidik, the Bangalore Papatti, who is also the darling of the vaidiks. The Brahmana Jati Party (BJP)called for a Bharat Bandh which proved a total flop. The Bahujans had no sympathy for their master crook, Jayendra Saraswati. The swami's case has once for all proved that the Brahmins and their bum-lickers have no respect for the rule of law — not even for the Constitution of India. Even when the murder victim happened to be a Brahmin and a devoted follower of the Kanchi Mutt, who fought against the swami's financial frauds and sex scandals, the country's entire vaidik vampire unitedly stood like one man behind the sinner. How can the country be safe under such rulers? Some Brahmins do feel that the swami is a sinner but they are not prepared to speak out. Such is the depth of their jati solidarity. And this vaidik vampire constitutes the core of India's ruling class, the historical villain condemned from Budha to Babasaheb. Only if we save India from these treacherous rulers we can establish Justice and Truth. (Dec.3, 2004)
____________________________________________________

The origin of "Jai Bhim"
Our Correspondent

Bangalore: The following report is from the Insight (Vol.1, No.2), a monthly journal of the Ambedkar Study Circle of the JNU Dalit students. Contact Anup Kumar, RN 122 - Periyar Hostel, JNU - 110 067. Single issue Rs. 10. Annual subscription Rs. 150:-

The originator of Jai Bhim (in 1937) was Babu L.N. Hardas, a strong follower of Dr. Ambedkar, chief secretary of the Independent Labour Party and in-charge of CP and Berar. Hardas was not comfortable with Jai Rama-pati — (presumably a reference to Dr. Ambedkar) — with which he was greeted. A moulavi explained to him the meaning of salam alekum, a greeting among the Muslims. From this, he got the idea of Jai Bhim.

It would be clear that Jai Bhim did not originate from Jai Hind. May be it is other way round. When the Christians meet they shake hands and touch cheek to cheek — jowl to jowl, when the Muslims meet they embrace each other. Thus both have got culture of bodily contact promoting bhai chara — brotherhood. We Dalits seem to have emulated Hindu culture of saying namaste and folding our own hands over the opposite person, as if to suggest "keep away from me".
____________________________________________________

Poverty drives Hindus to join Pak "terrorists"

Jammu: The surrender by a Hindu terrorist, Manoj Kumar Manhas, before an Army General at Nagrota on Nov.9 has exposed the trend of even the Hindu youth joining the Pakistan-backed militant outfits in the interior areas of Doda district that touches the borders of Himachal Pradesh. Manoj Kumar was a member of the Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) that was responsible for the massacre of hundreds of innocent persons in the state.

One of the reasons that the sources have put forth for the Hindu boys having joined the militant outfit is the extreme poverty in these areas. Manoj Kumar himself told media that he was kidnapped and given a gun by another Hindu militant, Baldev Singh. (Tribune, Nov.11, 2004).
____________________________________________________

Phule on Brahmin slavery
Our Correspondent

Bangalore: Here is an important dialogue between Mahatma Phule and his son, titled "Casteism" which is included in the textbook for second-year Bombay University students:

The son wonders why god did not intervene instead of allowing the shudras to suffer for centuries. Jyotiba answers: "The almighty finally took pity on the shudras. To free the shudras from the trap of casteism, god sent the casteless Muslims. Unfortunately, the Muslims failed the almighty. They started indulging themselves... Therefore, god, the creator, got quite angry and destroyed the Muslim empire. The son wonders: "after demolishing the Muslim kingdom, did the almighty relax?" Jyotiba's answer is: "No, god did not rest. The English were a barbaric lot at one time and used to live in the jungle. God let the English progress and develop, made them adventurous and sent them to India to free the shudras from the slavery of the Brahmins".

Bombay University had approved the textbook of philosophical prose in Marathi.
(Asian Age, Nov.21, 2004).
____________________________________________________

If there is evidence against Madani why he is not tried in court?
Our Correspondent

Bangalore: The rule of law in India can be bent to suit the needs of individuals. The notorious Kanchi swami involved in a murder case is defended by the country's rich and the powerful. But a revolutionary leader of poor Muslims of Kerala is rotting in Coimbatore jail without any charge for several years. This is India where we have two sets of law: one for the rulers and another for slaves:

Trivandrum: The TN Govt. has refused to take a lenient stand on the Kerala Govt.'s plea to facilitate the release of Abdul Nasser Madhani, chairman of People's Democratic Party, languishing in the Coimbatore central prison with severe health problems. The TN Govt. claims to possess strong evidence to prove Madhani's complicity in the Coimbatore bomb blasts. Hence the Kerala Govt. request to expedite the trial of the case is also not expected to yield favourable results for Madhani. (Deccan Herald, Nov.10, 2004).

If the TN Govt. has "strong evidences" against Madani why it has not put him up on trial? Why it did not act on the Supreme Court order to try him? Does it not prove the govt. has no evidence against him?

DV June 1, 2004 p. 24: "Madani gets bail".
DV April 1, 2004 p.20: "Conspiracy to keep Madani in jail?"
DV Feb.16, 2002 p.10: Madani rotting in Coimbatore jail".
DV March 15, 2001 p.4: "Madani rotting in jail".
____________________________________________________

RESERVATION PRIVATE SECTOR
Unpardonable crime of upper caste rulers

Our Correspondent
Bangalore: Four retired Andhra Pradesh High Court judges spoke in Bangalore on Nov.27 on the need for reservation in private sector by putting forward constitutional and legal arguments.

They gave scientific arguments and logical analysis.

The ruling Brahminical Social Order knows all their arguments. But it is not interested in listening to any of their arguments.

Has the ruling BSO ever listened to any demand of the oppressed Indians?

The reservation to SC/ST is recommended in the Constitution itself. But 50 years after the Constitution came into force, SC/ST reservations have not even reached 5% out of the stipulated 23%. When the BSO could refuse to ignore the constitutional obligation and the Supreme Court kept silent on this grave lapse, will the BSO implement reservation in private sector?

Those demanding reservation in private sector are silent on this unpardonable crime of the upper caste rulers.