Save UN from disaster : EU & China must check US autocratic tyranny
Our Correspondent
Bangalore: The beleaguered United Nations is all set
to expand its Security Council and strengthen its structure but the
oppressed majority
of the world — the Blacks, the Browns and the Yellows (which
includes Muslims, Dalits and Chinese) have every reason to say they
have no hope in this White Western outfit.
To America, the UN almost
died when the warlord of the world, George Bush, killed it and
launched his attack on Iraq (1991). Just as in
India, where we have the rule of the rich (upper castes), the UN
is today choking because of the American arrogance.
The UN was formed
in 1945 to save the world from the scourge of war. But how many
wars devastated the world since then? The deadliest
blow was inflicted on the UN, the only hope of the peace-lovers,
when George
Bush warned the UN that it was in the danger of "fading
into history as an ineffective, irrelevant debating society".
Iraq
war to save Israel: The zionist-controlled American President
went to the UN Security Council to seek its permission to attack
Iraq which, he said, threatened America. But the Security Council
said No.
America defied the world body, attacked Iraq and thereby inflicted
a death blow on the UN. What is the use of expanding the UN Security
Council and strengthening its structure when the world's sole
super power has all contempt for it? America is threatening UN
because
it is coming in the way of its aggression against Muslims, Blacks,
Browns
and Yellows who constitute the single largest population of the
world.
Annan calls it "illegal war": The American war
against Iraq was illegal. The UN Secretary-General Koffi Annan
himself said so.
The entire world agrees with Annan. But America says hell with
UN.
America says the UN is a nuisance. Nuisance to whom? It is
a nuisance to the micro-minority zionists whose sole interest is
to protect
the illegally established state of Israel by forcibly usupring
the land
of the Palestinians.
It is to save Israel, Bush was forced by
the zionists to wage war in Afghanistan and then Iraq. And the
latest is the preparation
to attack
in Iran on the pretext that it is preparing nuclear bombs.
America
might not have won in Afghanistan and faced defeat in Iraq also.
But what is the damage caused to the UN and
world peace?
Hope in China & European Union: Even
within America, there is considerable opposition to the Bush unilateral
war. The American puppy, Tom Blair,
is also forcing considerable opposition in England. That
means barring a micro-minority, the whole world is against
the Bush and Blair bid
to destroy UN.
The only hope is the regrouping taking place
in Europe under the leadership of French President Chirac and the
rise of
China as
a major world power.
India too would have become a world power by now but
its Brahminical rulers stunted its growth and joined with the
US-zionist forces
for selfish reasons.
So what is the use of expanding the
Security Council and strengthening the UN, when a micro-minority
destructive
force, armed with
its enormous military might, simply destroys the hopes
of the people
in UN?
The US argument is it has the divine right to
launch a pre-emptive war when it is convinced that on humanitarian
grounds that
such an invasion in necessary. All aggressors use
the same
language.
India's
Brahminical forces have been committing all the war
and violence on the oppressed Dalits, Muslims and
others only in the name
of non-violence, justice and peace. The zionist state
of Israel is
killing the poor,
innocent Palestinians using the same jargons. America
says it is waging
war to introduce democracy and establish human rights
in Muslim countries.
Dalits denied justice at Durban:
None in the world agrees with America or Israel. Even India's wars
in Kashmir
were frowned
upon by the
United Nations. Yet the war-mongers of the world
go on chipping and chopping
the United Nations which today presents a pathetic
picture.
The Dalits of India did not get justice
in Durban when it took its case before the UN to establish
that India's
ruling
BSO
is indeed
practising racism in the name of casteism. Entire
African continent is plagued
by the different kinds of zionist-inspired White
Western conspiracies – the
worst being AIDS.
The zionists who invented their "Clash of civilisations" theory
(Huntington: Clash of Civilisation, Penguin)
to enslave, if not eliminate, the Muslims, Blacks, Browns and Yellows
have popularised a new term
called "terrorism" which is synonymous
with Muslim.
It is learnt the panel to strengthen
the UN has
come out with an acceptable definition of the
word terrorism.
But
our point
is will
America and
its zionist bosses accept the new definition?
The
zionist PM of Israel, Aerial Sharon, says Palestinians are using "terrorism" to
kill "innocent" Israelis. But the
UN statistics say Israel has killed many more
Palestinians.
But the Western media, controlled
by the zionists, dubs only Palestinians as
terrorists but not the Israelis. How can the
UN establish
the rule of law when might is right?
Western
domination: What about forcible Israeli occupation
of Palestine? Did not the UN itself
condemn the Israeli
aggression? Israel has
been not only occupying areas after areas
belonging to Palestine but systematically
killing the Palestinians dubbing them terrorists.
But the West is silent. America is openly
supporting the
Israeli
aggression.
In the
face of
such blatant breaking of the UN rule of law,
how can the world body survive? The re-election
of
Bush is
a setback
to world
peace
and
a threat to UN.
Shift UN from US soil: The
problem with the UN is it is not only dominated by the rich
White
Western countries
but controlled
by America. Britain
with just 60 million population is a veto-wielding
permanent Security Council member. But
more populous but poorer
countries
like India,
South Africa, Brazil have no say. How can
the UN Security Council be a representative
body
of the
world when
smaller countries
dominate but highly populated countries
are ignored?
The UN should represent not the countries
but the peoples of those countries. If
the peoples
must
have a voice
then the
population of a country must be the determining
factor in constituting the
Security
Council.
Even if all these are accepted,
still the UN will be ineffective as long as
it is
located on the
soil of
America, that too
in New York
with its heavy zionist influence. The
UN headquarters
must be shifted out of the American
soil and preferably located
in Africa,
right
in the middle of the world.
Menace of
veto system: The UN must also bring about changes in its
veto system.
America
uses its veto
power whenever
a decision
goes
against its interests. Of particular
interest is the case of Israel. The
UN is not able to act against Israel,
Iraq
or any other trouble shot because
the US
blocks
it with
its veto
power.
This veto system is a menace.
Justice to humanity and the world has to
be decided on a democratic
basis. America uses the pretext
of
democracy for its every aggression.
So
much so it has become the world's most anti-democratic country
by misusing its
veto power. Just because
it has the military
might it
cannot go on trampling the United
Nations.
The UN will continue
to be a disaster to the oppressed if
it continues
to be a toy
in the
hands of the
intoxicated American
monkey and
its zionist controller.
____________________________________________________
Kanchi: How to save India from vaidik vampire ?
Our Correspondent
Bangalore: The Brahminical Social Order's most notorious
vaidik swami — now
rotting in the Vellore jail for murdering a fellow Brahmin — has
brought terrible shame on the entire vaidik vampire. Never before
it faced such a humiliation in "independent" India. This
fellow, who went to save Hinduism by harming Dalits, Muslims and
Christians etc. and to keep his jati as the ruling class, is today
being cursed by the Brahmins themselves as the non-Brahmins are silently
enjoying the fun. To the vaidik misfortune, the swami landed in trouble
because of an equally notorious vaidik, the Bangalore Papatti, who
is also the darling of the vaidiks. The Brahmana Jati Party (BJP)called
for a Bharat Bandh which proved a total flop. The Bahujans had no
sympathy for their master crook, Jayendra Saraswati. The swami's
case has once for all proved that the Brahmins and their bum-lickers
have no respect for the rule of law — not even for the Constitution
of India. Even when the murder victim happened to be a Brahmin and
a devoted follower of the Kanchi Mutt, who fought against the swami's
financial frauds and sex scandals, the country's entire vaidik vampire
unitedly stood like one man behind the sinner. How can the country
be safe under such rulers? Some Brahmins do feel that the swami is
a sinner but they are not prepared to speak out. Such is the depth
of their jati solidarity. And this vaidik vampire constitutes the
core of India's ruling class, the historical villain condemned from
Budha to Babasaheb. Only if we save India from these treacherous
rulers we can establish Justice and Truth. (Dec.3, 2004)
____________________________________________________
The origin of "Jai Bhim"
Our Correspondent
Bangalore: The following report is from the Insight
(Vol.1, No.2), a monthly journal of the Ambedkar Study Circle of
the JNU Dalit students.
Contact Anup Kumar, RN 122 - Periyar Hostel, JNU - 110 067. Single
issue Rs. 10. Annual subscription Rs. 150:-
The originator of Jai
Bhim (in 1937) was Babu L.N. Hardas, a strong follower of Dr. Ambedkar,
chief secretary of the Independent Labour
Party and in-charge of CP and Berar. Hardas was not comfortable
with Jai Rama-pati — (presumably a reference to Dr. Ambedkar) — with
which he was greeted. A moulavi explained to him the meaning of
salam alekum, a greeting among the Muslims. From this, he got the
idea
of Jai Bhim.
It would be clear that Jai Bhim did not originate
from Jai Hind. May be it is other way round. When the Christians
meet they shake
hands and touch cheek to cheek — jowl to jowl, when the Muslims
meet they embrace each other. Thus both have got culture of bodily
contact promoting bhai chara — brotherhood. We Dalits seem
to have emulated Hindu culture of saying namaste and folding our
own hands over the opposite person, as if to suggest "keep
away from me".
____________________________________________________
Poverty drives Hindus to join Pak "terrorists"
Jammu:
The surrender by a Hindu terrorist, Manoj Kumar Manhas, before
an Army General at Nagrota on Nov.9 has exposed the trend of even
the Hindu youth joining the Pakistan-backed militant outfits
in
the interior areas of Doda district that touches the borders
of Himachal Pradesh. Manoj Kumar was a member of the Hizbul Mujahideen
(HM) that was responsible for the massacre of hundreds of innocent
persons in the state.
One of the reasons that the sources have
put forth for the Hindu boys having joined the militant outfit
is the extreme poverty in
these areas. Manoj Kumar himself told media that he was kidnapped
and given a gun by another Hindu militant, Baldev Singh. (Tribune,
Nov.11, 2004).
____________________________________________________
Phule on Brahmin slavery
Our Correspondent
Bangalore: Here is an important dialogue between
Mahatma Phule and his son, titled "Casteism" which is
included in the textbook for second-year Bombay University students:
The
son wonders why god did not intervene instead of allowing the shudras
to suffer for centuries. Jyotiba answers: "The almighty
finally took pity on the shudras. To free the shudras from the trap
of casteism, god sent the casteless Muslims. Unfortunately, the Muslims
failed the almighty. They started indulging themselves... Therefore,
god, the creator, got quite angry and destroyed the Muslim empire.
The son wonders: "after demolishing the Muslim kingdom, did
the almighty relax?" Jyotiba's answer is: "No, god did
not rest. The English were a barbaric lot at one time and used to
live in the jungle. God let the English progress and develop, made
them adventurous and sent them to India to free the shudras from
the slavery of the Brahmins".
Bombay University had approved
the textbook of philosophical prose in Marathi.
(Asian Age, Nov.21, 2004).
____________________________________________________
If there is evidence against Madani why he is not tried in court?
Our Correspondent
Bangalore: The rule of law in India can be bent
to suit the needs of individuals. The notorious Kanchi swami involved
in a murder case
is defended by the country's rich and the powerful. But a revolutionary
leader of poor Muslims of Kerala is rotting in Coimbatore jail without
any charge for several years. This is India where we have two sets
of law: one for the rulers and another for slaves:
Trivandrum: The
TN Govt. has refused to take a lenient stand on the Kerala Govt.'s
plea to facilitate the release of Abdul Nasser Madhani,
chairman of People's Democratic Party, languishing in the Coimbatore
central prison with severe health problems. The TN Govt. claims
to possess strong evidence to prove Madhani's complicity in the Coimbatore
bomb blasts. Hence the Kerala Govt. request to expedite the trial
of the case is also not expected to yield favourable results for
Madhani. (Deccan Herald, Nov.10, 2004).
If the TN Govt. has "strong
evidences" against Madani why
it has not put him up on trial? Why it did not act on the Supreme
Court order to try him? Does it not prove the govt. has no evidence
against him?
DV June 1, 2004 p. 24: "Madani gets bail".
DV April 1, 2004 p.20: "Conspiracy to keep Madani in jail?"
DV Feb.16, 2002 p.10: Madani rotting in Coimbatore jail".
DV March 15, 2001 p.4: "Madani rotting in jail".
____________________________________________________
RESERVATION PRIVATE SECTOR
Unpardonable crime of upper caste rulers
Our Correspondent
Bangalore: Four retired Andhra Pradesh High Court judges spoke
in Bangalore on Nov.27 on the need for reservation in private
sector
by putting forward constitutional and legal arguments.
They gave
scientific arguments and logical analysis.
The ruling Brahminical
Social Order knows all their arguments. But it is not interested
in listening to any of their arguments.
Has the ruling BSO ever
listened to any demand of the oppressed Indians?
The reservation
to SC/ST is recommended in the Constitution itself. But 50 years
after the Constitution came into force,
SC/ST reservations
have not even reached 5% out of the stipulated 23%. When
the BSO could refuse to ignore the constitutional obligation
and the Supreme
Court kept silent on this grave lapse, will the BSO implement
reservation in private sector?
Those demanding reservation
in private sector are silent on this unpardonable crime of the
upper caste rulers.
|