"Terrorist" word gets new meaning

Bangalore: To malign the Muslims, President Bush, goaded by his zionist advisers, forced "undemocratic" Muslim countries to conduct elections. Such elections brought up wholesale "terrorists": Hamas in Palestine, Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Ahmedinijad in Iran. The latest is the whole battalion of rabidly anti-US Shias in Iraq. All these "terrorists" are democratically elected and validated by the votes. This raises an important question: how peace-loving common masses vote for a set of bloody people if they are indeed "terrorists" and hated?The West brainwashed by the zionist-controlled media and India under the Brahminical media have been dubbing Muslims as terrorists. Every Muslim may not be a "terrorist" but every "terrorist" is a Muslim.

Suicide bombers: The word "terrorist" has become synonymous with Muslims. But the oppressed masses in the West and India have refused to accept this label.

They say terrorism is not murder. Rather, terrorists fight the murderers. Terrorism, they say, is fully justified because it tries to right a wrong. The zionist Israel and the American stooge Hosni Mubarak in Egypt tried to kill innocent people and terrorism was born to protect them. Suicide bombers fight such murderers by first killing themselves. They die first. Terrorists love death but their enemies love life.Terrorists through their supreme sacrifice and suicide have become the darling of the persecuted people. And that is how they got elected.The world has to make peace with the terrorists and honour them if it wants to avert more terrorism.

________________________________________________________________________________

West fails to demonise "terrorists"

Bangalore: If armed terrorists are horrible people, hated people and violent people they must be naturally detested and disliked by all peace-loving masses. But in the recent Palestinian election the oppressed Arab masses embraced the very terrorists, voted wholesale and paraded them as heroes. Why?

Will the US-led White Western racists among Christians, who hate Hamas but love democracy, answer this question? They sent their observers to the latest Palestinian election and hailed it for its democratic perfection. We have answered this question in our article, "Who is a terrorist?" (DV Nov.16, 2001 p.7).

Hate-mongers among the White Western racists propounded their famous theory of "Clash of civilisations" to malign Islam and demonise Muslims with the ulterior motive of hoisting their blue-eyed boy, zionist Israel, on the world stage. For this they manufactured all sorts of lies and subterfuge and promoted and sold it through their monopoly media. And finally they failed.

But the poor Muslim masses refused to buy these lies. The shattering victory of revolutionary Hamas proved it. The election also proved that the masses love "terrorists" and loudly told the West that the more they went on demonising and killing revolutionaries more terrorists would be put on the centre-stage.

Look at the dirty lies of these zionist agents: they went on telling that the Hamas had sworn to destroy and eradicate Israel. But these rulers of the world are hiding the truth that for decades Israel refused to even recognise the existence of Palestinian people. Until 15 years ago Palestinians had to be smuggled to international summits as part of Jordon's delegation.

Khalid mishal, the topmost Hamas leader taking refuge in Syria, told Israel that Palestinians do not hate Jews.

"We don'tfight because you belong to a certain faith or culture. Jews have lived in Muslim world for 13 long centuries in peace and harmony... Our conflict with you is not religious but political. We have no problem with Jews who have not atacked us... Our problem is with those who came to our land, imposed themselves on us by force, destroyed our society and banished our people." (Hindu, Feb.1, 2006)

Just because West has a monopoly on media, it can't think it can change history. There are so many right thinking people even among the White Western Christians who are not racists. Now that the American-led West is facing defeat, will it grow wiser? We have our own doubts.

________________________________________________________________________________

Hamas victory a death blow to Israel

Bangalore: With the revolutionary Hamas winning absolute majority in the latest Jan.25 Palestine election (as predicted in DV Editorial of Feb.1, 2006) the very existence of the illegally established zionist nation of Israel has become a question mark.

Imperialists of the world in stunned paralysis are shell shocked but revolutionaries are rejoicing. DV line of argument has proved correct.

The zionist state of Israel is in deep trouble. Never before it has faced a battery of such all-round crisis:

(1) War-monger Prime Minister Ariel Sharon is "dead" and gone, (2) Hamas, the worst Palestinian enemy of zionists, vowed to wipe out Israel, wins the Palestinian election. (3) Iran gets support from all progressive forces of the world to go ahead with bomb. (4) Israel's sole protector George Bush, defeated in Iraq and hated by the whole word, becomes weak.

Hamas victory is also a rejection of the American-supported Palestinian Authority led by Mohamud Abbas. Hamas won the election because it first won the hearts of the suffering Palestinians. Hundreds of Hamas leaders died in the powerful intifada that forced the zionist state to come down for talks with Palestinians. Israel killed Hamas founder Sheikh Yassin and its top leader Abdulaziz Rantisi. Besides, the Hamas enjoyed a reputation for honesty and social service.

Hamas success is as much an expression of the determination of Palestinians to resist Israel's efforts to force their surrender as it is a rejection of the corrupt Fatah. It reduces the conflict to its most fundamental elements: as long as there is occupation there will be resistance.George Bush pretended to be a lover of democracy and forced Palestine to have election. And the election brought up America's and its friend Israel's worst enemy, Hamas, as the victor. Bush thought he could use democracy card to humiliate Muslims but it actually went against American interests in Egypt, Palestine and even in Saudi Arabia.

DV Jan.1, 2006 p.7: "Democracy experiment in Egypt goes against US".

________________________________________________________________________________

Lalu backs DV's "caste identity" thesis

Bangalore: Lalu Prasad Yadav, one of India's topmost Backward Caste leaders, has fully backed DV's "caste identity" thesis.

In what can be called a very candid confession, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief said caste and not merit used to be the single most important criterion for carrying out reshuffle of government officers during RJD regime.

"Hum unke surname dekhtey they", Lalu said. He said he used to do this to ascertain whether the officer was from the Backward Caste or not before posting him in a district. The practice formed the main plank of the government's social justice campaign, he added.

Speaking at a party function to celebrate the birth anniversary of former Chief Minister Karpoori Thakur, he said he used to post only Backward Caste officers on field posts, including the posts of DM, SP, officer in charge, SDO, BDO, etc. as he wanted to chip the wings of the upper castes. The biggest achievement of my regime is that feudalism in Bihar was crushed, he said. (Hindustan Times, Jan.25, 2006). Lalu depending solely on the official's surname to find out the person's caste shows the important role played by the surname which indicated the caste of a person.

During the Editor's 3-day stay at Patna, he could make out that in Bihar everything was decided by caste.

All the upper castes flaunted their surnames proudly but the "lower castes" ashamed of their caste dropped their surnames. Lalu gave pride to the SC/ST/BC castes and they have again started using their original surnames.

________________________________________________________________________________

Karnataka caste war

Bangalore: Brahminical toilet papers are not telling the truth about the latest political developments in Karnataka. Because the truth is unpalatable to the upper caste 15% rulers.

But a careful reader will note these papers, making a daily dig at ex-PM H.D. Deve Gowda, have suddenly started praising him. Why? Because he secretly managed to bring the Brahmana Jati Party (BJP) to power. That is how the Gowda has suddenly become their darling. Gowda belongs to an upper caste Vokkaliga (14%). They have been always fighting the other upper caste Lingayats (16%). The Brahmins (3%) have been for long playing the one against the other and making the best use of every govt. It is Siddaramaiah, a powerful BC leader of the shepherd caste (8%) whose dismissal as Dy. CM by Gowda that triggered the present caste war in which all the three upper castes joined hands to fight the BCs, Dalits (15) and Muslims (12%).

This is an interesting development. The credit goes to Siddaramaiah for uniting the entire oppressed sections against the three upper castes.

Siddaramaiah has become the state's most popular leader loved by the oppressed masses craving for social change —not political change. If he leads such a movement against upper caste oppressors he need not chase chief ministership but it will chase him.

________________________________________________________________________________

The fallen & forgotten 26% Indians

Bangalore: For the first time in the history of India, the country's rulers thought of publishing a report on the country's social development giving a shocking picture of the wretched of the earth. And as expected the entire toilet papers of India run by the Brahmin-Bania combine have blacked out the reports.

Why? Because the report is inconvenient and unpleasant to the "India Shining" walas.

The report does not mention the author of the report or who released the report. However, the "poor" have been identified as SC/ST/BCs — giving lie to the often-advanced argument that the Brahmins also have plenty of poor.

A large proportion — 26% or about 26 million (193 million in rural areas and 67 million in urban areas) — of Indians are still below the poverty line, according to India's first Social Development Report released in New Delhi on Jan.27. Orissa has the highest number of people living below the poverty line (47.15%), followed by Bihar (42.60%) and Assam (36.09%) While poverty levels have shown a decline, there is huge disparity among the social classes with the percentage of the poor among the Scheduled Tribes being 43.8%, Scheduled Castes 36.2% and Other Backward Classes 21%. (Hindu, Jan.28, 2006).

According to our sources that 26% Indians living below the poverty line is a damn under-estimate. They say it is much more. Almost 50%. The rulers are not bothered about this report. They are busy enjoying their huge unearned profits in black money. The thugs and pindaries are busy looting the country by sucking the blood of the Dalits, tribals and BCs. Every political party is cheating them. So too the reigning religions of the land.

That means the officially admitted 26% of the Wretched of the Earth are forgotten for ever.

That the entire Brahminical media chose not to publish this unpleasant report — first of its kind — proves how much the rulers hate the Wretched of the Earth.

If you have tears, shed them now.