Sikhs always used to fight Muslims then & Dalits today
KULDIP KUMAR, HISAR, HARYANA
The Vienna murder of a Ravidasi saint has two sides: historical
background and immediate reasons. (1) Background: Guru Nanak, a
Khatri by caste became saint in 1500 AD. He sang songs in praise
of Hindu gods. He met two saints at Kashi, Guru Kabir and Guru
Ravidas, who changed his course. He started singing bani (sermons)
of these gurus. Some old scholars claim that Guru Kabir
was his real guru. Anyhow he spread message of these gurus in Punjab.
Nanak’s followers were called Sikhs i.e. learners. Sikhism
had ten gurus. Early Sikhism is nothing but teachings of Guru Kabir
and Guru Ravidas. It completely discarded Brahmins and their rituals.
Brahmins use Sikhs: The ninth Guru was approached
by Brahmins. They flattered him and his son Guru Gobind Singh (10th
and the last guru). But the 9th guru was beheaded at Chandni Chowk,
Delhi.
Guru Gobind Singh (1699) started the Khalsa Panth. Mostly
Mazahabis and Chamars joined his army. No Brahmin came. Though
it is true that the Sikh religion was born to fight Brahminism,
the fact is the Brahmins throughout used the Sikh martial race
to attack and kill the Muslims.
Despite M.K. Gandhi deceiving them on Sikh homeland and Jinnah
promising the same, they did not join Pakistan but preferred to
go with Brahmins. Even after the “Blue Star” massacre
of Sikhs, they simply forgot all the crimes and joined the Brahmana
Jati Party (BJP) as its electoral partner.
Though the Sikhs are not trusted by the Hindu rulers,
they will be too eager to fight Pakistan if another war breaks
out. To that extent they are hinduised (corrupted).
All the gurus treated Dalits with dignity. So too the Jat Sikhs.
But after the death of Gobind Singh, Brahminic people (called Masand)
took charge of Sikhism.
Dalit bani in guru Granth: This
situation continued till the advent of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar.
Many Chamars from Jallandhar area went abroad and became millionaire/billionaires.
They promoted Ravidas mandirs/gurudwaras. When
Kanshi Ram, a Punjabi Dalit, started his movement, Dalits joined
him fully.
Guru Nanak carried with him the bani (writings) of Dalit
gurus. He commanded his successors to compile banis of
all the saints. Almost all Dalit saints’ bani have
been included in the Guru Granth. This bani is
recited in all Sikh gurudwaras and also Ravidas mandirs called Dera.
Some 5-6 years back, some Sikhs came to a dera and tried
to hoist Nishan Sahib (a sword like symbol of Sikhs) to
annex Ravidas temples under the Sikh Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee
(SGPC). Dalits of all castes resisted and foiled the move. Bloody
fights broke out between Jats and Dalits who showed their real
strength. It is a historical fact that Dalit Sikhs sacrificed their
lives for Sikh gurus but the upper caste Sikhs always betrayed
them. A peace pact was arranged between Dalits and Jats by then
CM, Amrinder Singh, at Akal Takhat (the highest seat of Sikhs)
which directed the SGPC not to meddle with deras.
Dera Sachkhand Ballan is the most popular Dera of Guru
Ravdas. Two years ago its followers made an idol of pure gold worth
crores of rupees, took it thru procession from Punjab to Varanasi.
Millions of Dalits joined the procession.
This hurt the caste pride of upper caste Sikhs but they had no
courage to touch the Ballan saints. So they chose Austria.
However, the Chamars showed their courage and killed one/two
gun-wielding attackers without any weapon.
**************
DV REF. ON FALL OF SIKHISM
DV Dec . 16, 2007 p. 20: “A brave flag-bearer in war against
Brahminism”.
DV June 16, 2007 p.5: “Punjab dress rehearsal for a bloody
caste war: SC/BCs used to fight Jat Sikhs”, p. 5: “Brahminism
swallows Sikhism”.
DV July 16, 2006 p.11: “Fall of Sikhism begam with Sikh
hatred of Dalits”.
DV Aug.1, 2005 p.21: “Sikhism not only not Hindu but anti-Hindu”.
DV May 16, 2005 p.25: “Dalit scholar saves Sikhism from
jaws of Brahminism”.
DV May 1, 2005 p.278: “Dalit Sikhs suffered as they did
not know the supreme truth”.
DV March 16, 2005 p.8: “No, we Dalits will not burn Dasam
Granth” & “Jat Sikhs vs. Dalits”, & p.
9: “DV’s Sikhs-on-death-bed warning must be taken
seriously”.
DV Feb.16, 2005 p.5: “Dalits must burn Dasam Granth to
save Sikhs from Brahminism”, p.7: “Sikh militants in
grief & pain”, p. 9: “Editor visits Chandigarh
jail”.
DV Edit Feb.1, 2005: “If Sikhism is not saved from sure
death, Brahminism will run riot & kill every protest movement” & p.
5: “Sikhism reels under vaidik attack: Dasam
Granth to replace Guru Granth”.
DV Nov.16, 2004 p.9: “Sikhs depicted as monkeys in Hindu
film TV serials & media” & p. 9: “Sikhs: Slaves
enjoying their slavery”.
DV Edit Oct.1, 2004: “Dalit bid to save Sikhism from Brahminical
counter-revolution”.
DV Aug.16, 2004 p.9: “Don’t create Dalit-Sikh rift” & “Sikhism
founded by Nanak”.
DV Aug.1, 2004 p.20: “Brahmins not enemy of Punjab Dalits
but Jat Sikhs”.
DVJune 16, 2004 p.11: “Ballan Dalit saints revolt against
upper caste Sikhs”.
DV Sept.1, 2003 p. 20: “Sikh weekly admits mistakes of Jats”.
DV Aug.1, 2003 p.21: “Sikhs divided into 3 warring camps:
Upper castes, Jats & Dalits”
DV June 1, 2003 p.17: “Brahminism eating up Sikhism”.
DV March 1, 2003 p. 22: “Vaidiks injected anti-Muslim hatred
to destroy Sikhism” & “Gandhi & Sikhism”.
p. 23: “Master Tara Singh saotaged Muslim-Sikh pact?”
DV Nov.16, 2002 p.22: “Dalit Sikhs thank DV for warning
on slow death of Sikhism”.
DV Oct.16, 2002 p.7: “Sikhism comes under total Brahmin
control”.
DV Sept.16, 2002 p.16: “Top Sikh journal agrees with DV
prediction”.
DV Oct.16, 2001 p.23: “Brahminism eats into Sikh vitals”.
DV Aug.1, 2001 p.22: “Justice Kuldip Singh’s anti-reservation
verdict violates Sikh tenets”.
DV July 1, 2001 p.21: “Guru Granth nowhere advocates
vegetarianism or meat-eating” & p.22: “Why Dalits
still stick to Sikhism when they ar sent out of gurdwaras?”
DV March 16, 2001 p.7: “DV doing job of Khalsa better than
many Sikhs”, p.8: “Power corrupted Sikhs & Brahminism
swallowed revolutionary religion”, & p.11: “Anti-Sikh
forces impose Brahminical rituals on gurdwaras”, “Sikh
leadership under Hindu nazi control”.
DV Feb.16, 2001 p.7: “Sikhs must never believe any vaidik
promise”, p.8: “DV bid to de-hinduise Sikhs resented”, “DV
wins battle to prove Sikhs are not Hindus” & p.10: “Brahminism
causes intellectual desert in Sikhism”.
DV Edit Dec.16, 2000: “Jat Sikhs in hurry to quit sinking
ship of Sikhism & seek shelter under BSO, happy with shudra
(slave) status”, p.8: “Suffocated Dalit Sikhs searching
for a liberating religion” & p.11: “How to save
Sikhism from sure death?”
DV Dec.1, 2000 p.8: “Did Dalit Sikhs also give up efforts
to rescue Sikhism”.
DV Oct.1, 2000 p.8: “Treacherous BSO divides Sikhs to destroy
revolutionary Sikhism”.
DV July 1, 2000 p.21: “Angry Dalit Sikhs may go back to
Budhism or break Sikhism” & p.22: “Heinous role
of Brahmin Sikhs of Kashmir”.
DV June 1, 2000 p.8: “How Sikhs missed every bus”.
DV May 16, 2000 p.18: “Ram found in Sikh scriptures is not
Hindu god Ram”.
Dalits must not seek temple entry because we are not Hindu
DR. K. JAMANADAS, “SHALIMAR”, MAIN ROAD, CHANDRAPUR
- 442 402
A few years back I had read that the Dalits from South India were
fighting for their right to pull the temple car in annual rath
yatra. They were fighting not for sitting on the ratha,
pulled by others. They were fighting for getting harnessed to the ratha,
on which the Brahmins were sitting. Then we read about the Dalits
from Orissa fighting for the darshan i.e. having glimpses
of the Brahmin god. The Brahmins wanted the Dalits to have a darshan through
a hole in the wall, and the Dalits wanted to have the glimpses
without the wall. Some similar situation had been reported from
Karnataka also.
RAJASTHAN YAGNA
Now a report comes from Rajasthan (Nagsen, March 23,
2009 the Dalit Adhikar Kendra, Rajasthan). In Bhilwada dt. in a
village Tiloli having a population of 11 different Dalit castes
totaling 1,965 of 452 families out of total population of about
5,000. The Dalits are fighting for participation in a yagna the
Hindus are conducting. They approached the govt. The yagna organizers
denied any discrimination and the authorities prevented the flare-up
of tension through a compromise that only the Brahmin priests will
be putting the aahuti (oblation) in the fire of yajna and
none else. The Adhikar Kendra people are aggrieved that
the authorities did not consider the matter as observation of untouchability
and take preventive action; instead, they only took it as a law
and order situation. The Dalit youth who are reportedly educated
and united, seem to think they are on the correct path. They might
be feeling even jubilant at the understanding. But I think, they
are on the wrong path.
DR. AMBEDKAR VERDICT
Dalits are not Hindu and were never Hindu. Thus said our savior,
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar. He organized satyagraha for Mahad
water tank, when he burnt the Manusmriti. When he got
deceived by Gandhi and was forced to sign the Poona Pact and
was even cheated after that, he decided the Hindus would never
be willing to give treatment of equality to Dalits and he decided
to renounce Hinduism. And then came that famous declaration: I
was born a Hindu, which was not in my hand; but I would not die
a Hindu”.
QUIT HINDUISM CALL
Ultimately he renounced Hinduism and adopted Budhism (1956). He
then gave Budhism to half a million of followers at Nagpur and
Chandrapur. Since then the way of Dalits is decided for them. And
that way is the Way to the Buddha.
If that is our way, why insist on having darshan of Brahmin
gods or put valuable grains and ghee into fire in wasteful yajnas?
That is not our culture. That is never beneficial to humanity.
The Budha renounced it originally, and then time and again. That
was the fight of the Budha against the Brahmins, which ultimately
brought in untouchability around the time of Adi Shankara, about
thousand years after the Budha. We worshipped the gods of Brahmins
for thousands of years. That did not bring any emancipation to
us. That did not bring us health, wealth, prosperity or prestige
or any right to learning or even to bear arms. It was because of
this, we had to submit to the atrocities of the Brahminic law books;
that is how we were reduced to dust.
No Brahmin god came down to earth to wipe our tears. With a great
effort by Dr. Babasaheb, we have now learned how to come out of
the mud of Brahmanism. So why we are again going back to Brahminism?
Let us fight for human rights. Sure! Let us maintain our organization
and unity. But take care that we do not go towards Brahmin and
their gods and yagnas.
HOPE IN BARACK OBAMA
62-year-old III-World War against Islam will end only with Palestinian
peace
V.T. RAJSHEKAR
Can we say that the West launched its zionist-inspired prolonged
Third World War against Islam on Nov.29, 1947 when the captive
United Nations was forced to divide Palestine—that legitimately
belonged to Muslims —and called for the establishment of
Israel with the full support of the West? This 62-year-old war
has led to unprecedented world-wide Muslim anger which India’s
ruling Brahminical people and the zionist-led Wet described as “terrorism”.
West losing war on Islam
Today, no country is spared from this “terrorism”,
the origin of which is in the creation of zionist Israel. The West
which boasts of its democracy, justice, secular credentials gave
birth to the state of Israel based only on race and religion. “Secularists” in
the West and India do not tolerate Islamic “revival” but
the zionist state based only on race and religion is praised even
when it goes on killing Palestinians. How the “socialists” tolerate
a religion-based Israeli state? No answer.
But in DV, we have already said that the zionists in the West
and the Brahminists in India are losing their Third World War against
Islam. (DV Aug.1, 2004 p.23: “How America got defeated
in war on terror”).
Verdict of small minds
Clear signs of the end to this history’s longest war are
now visible with President Obama warning Israel’s blood-thirsty
zionist Prime Minister, Benyamin Netanyahu, when they met in the
White House recently.
Our upper caste critics may say: what nonsense. They may find
fault with us for calling it the Third World War. They may also
say:
Sporadic wars are going on in different parts, mainly the Middle-East,
but how can it be called a WW-III? What is going is some skirmishes,
some occasional shootout in isolated areas against terrorists”.
Brahminism defeated
There is lot of difference between small minds and great minds.
We are basing our conclusions on the findings of “great minds” —not
small minds like Huntington or Salman Rushdie. We are basing our
conclusions on the massive historical research made by a celebrated
historian, David Selbourhne, a distinguished professor at Oxford
University and a writer for the London Times, Guardian, Sunday
Telegraph, the Independent, New Statesman etc.
And author of a dozen world famous books. It is in the book, The
Losing Battle with Islam (Indian edition, 2006, Viva Books),
he comes out with a very detailed study of the “war on Islam” and
says the Third World War actually started on Nov.29, 1947. He lists
the different countries and areas where the West and India’s
Hindu rulers launched wars on Islam.
Salbourne has covered the whole world and hence we are fully justified
in borrowing his sentence that what is currently going on is the “Third
World War on Islam” and in this war the zionist-led West
and Brahminism led-India are defeated.
But, alas, the world’s academia, which is supposed
to look without blinkers, has also become a victim of prejudice
when it comes to Muslims. As regards India, caste prejudices
walk in the front and the “intellectual” follows.
(India’s Intellectual Desert, DSA-1999).
So the verdict of David Selbourne, who is acknowledged world over
as a distinguished scholar and an impartial observer, is suffice
to silence our critics. DV proves right.
2% Jews control U.S.
Since Israel was proclaimed as an independent state, 12 US Presidents
have met with 13 Israeli Prime Ministers. But all failed because
a mere 2% zionist Jews are controlling America and making it dance
to the tunes of the zionists.
America is today slowly dying only because the angry zionists
are bent upon killing it. But this will not happen because China
will not allow it.
But Barack Obama was the first President to strike a different
tune showing genuine sympathy with the suffering Palestinians who
are the rightful owners of the land. This is history. Details of
the latest round of talks will be available only when Obama makes
a policy speech on June 6 at Cairo on Middle East settlement.
India a failed state
Several significant international developments are pointing that
Obama’s peace deal in Middle East will be a success — though
ultimately Obama and the world will have to force the deal on the
zionist state in the interest of ending the Third World War. The
factors favouring such a happy development are the defeat of the
zionist-controlled White Western racists in their 62-year-old war
against Islam and Muslims, the rise of Iran as a nuclear power,
shift of economic power from US to China, the weakening of America
as a sole super power with its powerful Jewish financial bosses
in trouble and finally the immense world-wide popularity of the
Black-cum-Muslim American President who has already declared that
US is not at war with Islam.
Brahminist rulers of India, who are in league with zionists,
had high hope that they could bend the country to suit their
needs. But in the process they only made the country a laughing
stock — a failed state.
Pope’s mischief
Israel has caused enough damage to world peace, world-wide violence
and unrest by its aggression on Palestinian land — triggering
the 62- year-old Third World War. If the Jews — they say
there are any number of peace-mongers inside and outside Israel — want
peace and security, they cannot get it until Palestinian self-determination
is achieved.
All the American Administrations controlled by the Jews have been
too kind to Israel. But for the first time Obama was tough with
Netanyahu. We are sure Obama will get full support from the Western
Christian politicians. The Pope has already visited Palestine and
blessed a two-state solution but mischievously did not spell out
the modalities of it.
Get rid of Abbas
One of the biggest obstacles to peace deal comes from the Palestinian
state headed by Abbas. But the people are with Hamas.
Every conflict in the Middle East and even the Muslim anger the
world over is linked to the Palestinian question. The world will
get real peace only when the zionist Israel is cut to size. The
entire peace-loving world will agree with this except the 2% Jews
controlling America. Even many Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia
fully under zionist control, will have a sigh of relief if the
Palestinian problem is solved. Many fake Muslim leaders will automatically
fall dead.
Like the Brahminists in India who love drinking blood, the zionist
Jews take great pleasure in other’s misery. Both are cousins
(Read our book, Brahminism, DSA-2001, and other pamphlets).
Defeat of West
Palestine was handed over to zionists by the zionist-controlled
Britain, the then sole super power of the world. That is how the
zionists and its Christian tail launched the longest lasting Third
World War which has now spread to almost every country in the world.
But in every war against Muslims the West got defeated and the
killer George W. Bush himself got booted out.
India’s Muslim-hating Brahminical races conspired to divide
India driving out the Muslims to Pakistan triggering an unending
war with Muslims.
In the West, it was the Christians and Jews who were at war with
each other. Anti-Muslim war and violence started only with the
creation of Israel. Today zionists are controlling the Vatican
also.
Confidence in Obama
There are any number of peace-loving people in the world. All
producers of wealth need peace. It is the micro-minority urban-dwelling
manipulators (Brahminists and zionists live only in cities) who
want war and violence. As the Western media and the Indian media
are controlled by the manipulators, the voices of peace-lovers
is not be heard.
But Obama with his high international prestige and his background
as a Black and Muslim, the two worst suffering people of the world,
can bring peace to Palestine. And thus end the longest 62-year-old
war to end all other future wars.
DV Feb.16, 2009 p.9: “DV proved right on Palestine”.
DV Edit Feb.1, 2009: “Blood thirsty zionists can’t
defeat Hamas”.
DV May 1, 2008 p.7: “More bad news for Israel”.
DV April 1, 2008 p.6: “Hamas bravery rattles zionists”.
DV Jan.1, 2008 p.5: “Arab surrender to zionists?”
DV Aug.16, 2007 p.18: “Hamas may grab West Bank”.
DV July 16, 2007 p. 12: “DV supports revolutionary Hamas & assures
victory to Palestinians”.
DV July 1, 2006 p.19: “Abbas as stooge of Israel”.
DV March 1, 2006 p. 5: “Israeli tail wags US dog”.
DV Edit Feb.16, 2006: “Shift Israel to America” Zionist
state threatned by deadly enemies all around” .
DV Feb.1, 2006 p. 5: “Curse of Muslims kills killer Sharon”.
DV Jan.1, 2006 p.9: “More on racism within Israel”.
DV Dec.16, 2005 p.8: ‘Racism within Israel?”
DV Sept.16, 2005 p.21:”Palestinians attract world attention”.
DV Edit Aug.1, 2005: “Thoughts on London bombing: Terrorism
will continue until Palestine problem is solved”.
DV March 16, 2005 p.7: “US-imposed peace pact collapses”.
DV March 1, 205 p.5: “Palestine - Israel peace pact bound
to fail”.
DV Jan.1, 2005 p.15: “Abbas dissapoints Palestinians?”
DV Aug.16, 2004 p.6: “Palestine: Meaning of New World Order”.
DV April 16, 2004 p.9: “Palestine must get ready for wholesale
jehad against zionists”.
DV March 1, 2004 p.9: “When Nature itself supports Palestinians
why stop Intifada?”
Zionism: monster of Islamophobia
V.T. RAJSHEKAR
Alan Hart, a White British historian, expert on Palestine-Israel
conflict and an authority on zionism, warns that “anti-semitism
is on the rise”.
In his “Author’s Note” on the first of the gigantic
four-volume American edition of his famous book, Zionism — the
Real Enemy of Jews, Vol.1, Published by Clarity Press, USA,
describes Israel as “the cancer at the heart of international
affairs”. Describing Americans as the “most idealistic
people on earth”, he says many of them are uninformed about
the conflict in Middle East because of the “Israeli-occupied
media”. He tells Americans brain-washed by the zionist-controlled
American media that “the overwhelming majority of all Arabs
and Muslims everywhere do not hate America or Americans” and
warns that “the monster of Islamophobia is on the prowl across
the land of the free and licking its lips”. All this because
of the zionist lobby’s influence on the American policy.
“Jews of India”: Alan Hart learnt
about the “Jews of India” when we met in London three
years ago at a book release function. Later he came to Bangalore
to address a Muslim conference which we also addressed. In his
public speech, he admitted that his research also revealed that
Brahmins indeed are the “Jews of India”, which is our
finding now widely accepted in India and outside.
In his foreword to the new book, he says Judaism and zionism are
not one and the samething. Criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic.
The book was first published by the author himself in London because
all the British publishers were frightened that it might offend
zionism which is also controlling England. He has great praise
for the Diana G. Collier, the Editorial Director of Clarity Press,
which is America’s leading Black publishing house.
Incidentally our book, Dalit — The Black Untouchables
of India, (1987) which has gone into fourth print, was also
published by America’s very same premier Black publishing
House.
********************
Epic History of
Zionism
The Real Enemy of the Jews
Vol. 1 : The False Messiah
2009 pp.400 $21.25
Clarity Press INC,
Ste.469, 3277-Rosewell Rd., NE,
Atlanta, GA-30305
email: clarity@islandnet.com
Brahmins & their poverty
A BRAHMIN (NAME & ADDRESS WITHHELD)
Dalit Voice is full of criticisms about Brahmins whom
you call as India’s ruling class. But there are any number
of poor among the Brahmins including myself.
Yes. This is the a familiar song. In our school and college days,
we used to read any number of story books beginning with the sentence: “Once
upon a time there lived a poor Brahmin.....”.
Poverty is always associated with Brahmins so that such repetitions
will leave a permanent impression on young minds that the Brahmins
indeed are poor. Repeat a lie 99 times and it becomes truth at
the 100th time. But the fact is the Brahmins are the unquestioned
rulers of the land. Forget about this fact, let us accept your
own version. Brahmins and their parties ruled India trying to convince
us that there are any number of poor among Brahmins. So saying
they ruled India for 62 years. Yet they could not eradicate the
poverty of their own caste people. How can they lift others? — EDITOR.
Dalit movement is anti-woman ?
THUMMAPUDI BHARATHI, PH.D, ENGLISH DEPT, S.P.MAHILA UNIVERSITY,
TIRUPATI—517 502
To be a woman is a disadvantage; to be a Dalit woman is a double
disadvantage. Her sex is her great disadvantage. This is a patriarchal
world. Sociology openly demeans her gender and her caste; theology
openly deifies her but secretly undermines her dignity and security
as a human being. No religion has ever come to her help or help
to empower her. Religions have only deified her: but never humanized
her. In the Bible very subtly she is called by her generic
name woman at the birth; only after her fall she is called Eve.
HINDUISM IS ANTI-WOMAN
There was a time, that too, a long time, during which Hinduism
was the only religion in our country. Its rituals, and scriptures
nurtured and glorified superstitions of all types which encompassed
not only its theology but they also enveloped the sociology of
the subcontinent. Its superstitions oppressed the inferior castes
but specially oppressed the women.
LONG HAIR
The worst sufferings of the women were not only that they were
kept under a kind of unannounced house-arrest but they were even
pushed to a sub-human condition of existence. Their souls were
shrouded and their bodies given prominence and were thereby exploited.
Their lives were cheapened and they were involved in the practice
of pleasurable arts like natana and natya and
music. In their private and public lives they were merely toys
in the hands of their menfolk.
Even their dress were designed by men. Their ornaments
and external decorations though declared only to improve their
physical appeal, they even cluttered their movements. Long hair
on their heads has no functional value; it only consumed their
time in the upkeep. The flowers they wore on their hair and their
dress prevented their quick movement.
They were tied to delicate and effeminate gestures which incapacitated
them from public participation in social activities. Their flowers
and face-wash and their flowing hair were all dove-tailed to the
presence or absence of their consorts and became symbols of their
marital or windowed state of existence in their family and society.
Even their lives were contingent on those of their husbands that sati became
not only a practice but a sacred ritual. Killing the female fetus
or the newborn female baby became an ingredient of the Hindu culture.
LOWEST LITERACY
All these were the fate of women in India. They were worse compounded
in the case of the Dalit women. Women’s literacy rate was
low enough; Dalit women’s literacy was the lowest imaginable—97%
of Dalits come under poverty-line depending on daily wages. When
men folk go to their daily chore, women and girls become baby-sitters
or field-workers.
PLIGHT OF EDUCATED DALIT WOMEN
In the urbanized context young Dalit girls some times at the age
of 10 years or so are employed as full-time maid-servants where
both the couple is employed. Hence they are denied education. Their
alienation from education and financial poverty and dependence
nurture their backwardness and superstitions.
Their religion and caste lead to illiteracy and financial dependence
which together go to entangle the Indian Dalit woman in her sociological
trap. Added to all these her sex has also been constructed into
a gender by the ignoble patriarchal philosopher. Genderisation
has been the concerted work of not only the conspiratorial patriarch
but also the dedicated contribution of the matriarchs in our households.
WOMEN IN PUBLIC LIFE
The small percent of women who were educated and employed and
hence have attained a certain level of liberation are refusing
to come forward to liberate the still unliberated Dalit woman.
They even refuse to participate in public life leave alone Dalit
movements and activities. A majority of these liberated working
Dalit women do not have the freedom and time to spend their salaries
for any pro-Dalit activities. Their lives are controlled by their
men, who in most cases are unemployable, unemployed men who try
to live in the earnings of their spouses and daughters.
Dalit oppression has not merely been social, economical
and political, it has, at its roots, been psychological.
It has killed in the minds of the Dalits even the desire to be
self-respecting and dignified. Long-time mental bleaching has made
them and kept them as vagabonds and drunkards. It has nurtured
their irresponsibility almost as a counter-value. Because of this
most of the Dalit families hang round the neck of the Dalit woman.
Man has developed the negative capacity to abandon the family’s
interest while woman cannot shirk her responsibility as a mother.
She plays, tragically, a mother even to her husband
There is another danger the Dalit women have to face. If they
overcome all hurdles and become Dalit activists and participate
in public programs they are easily mistaken for being light-hearted
and men try to exploit them. Such women become easy prey to the
evil designs and desires of men. It is also a general opinion of
a majority of men that a woman in public life is a sign for her
willingness to drink and have a free sexual affair with any man.
A woman on a public stage is not held in high regard as a sweet-stay-at-home
is. A solo woman has not been able to win respect from the menfolk
in our country. Even other women don’t respect her.
A highly professional woman is accused of violating traditional
norms and a highly traditional woman is to an equal extent accused
of being old fashioned. This is a dilemma for the Indian Dalit
woman. She knows not what to do because a liberated woman is easily
considered exploitable—socially, physically and sexually.
Women, given the opportunities, have not only proved equal
to men, they have even surpassed them in public and professional
lives.
One can reel out names from all over the world. Hence patriarchy
has skillfully kept women out of many areas of human activity,
especially from society-forming. Child-bearing, a natural biological
activity, has been ritualized into a religions drama to insulate
the woman from dynamic social involvement.
The British women got their voting rights through street fights.
Later and because of that when India got her “freedom at
midnight” our women got their voting right even without asking
for it. Our Dalit women too got it that way. But it was like a
penalty corner, they have failed to convert it because they have
gone on trying to get this goal through converting men which has
proved impossible. Therefore, if men cannot be converted, there
is only one alternative: they have to be conquered. Only a conquest
will end the woman’s quests for a space in the sun.
**************
Greatest weakness is male-domination
We fully agree with Sister Bharati. We go round the country
addressing meetings which are attended only by Dalit men. Even
when our invitations specifically direct them to bring their
wives, mothers, daughters, they come alone. When we ask them
why they failed to heed our request their answer is: “Who
is there to prepare food when we go home?” Their women
are reduced to a mere cooks. It is true that the upper caste
society is more male-dominated but their women get at least a
chance to visit the temples which promote Brahminical supremacy.
Our women have no such forum. When the male-dominated Dalit movement
itself is in doldrums, when can we see the dawn of Dalit women’s
liberation — despite Mayawati heading the country’s
most powerful Dalit party? The greatest weakness of the Dalit
movement is it is male-dominated — EDITOR.
COMMUNICATION
Which BAMCEF should DV support ?
DR. V.D. CHANDANSHIVE, COTTAGE VAISHALI, SHAHU NAGAR,NANDED -
431 602
I was indeed shocked to read Brother Gurnam Singh Muktsar’s
writeup (DV April 16, 2009, p.13) asking DV to support Waman Meshram’s
BAMCEF and the Editor’s consent to support it to fight Brahminism.
I know Waman Meshram from very close quarters. He worked here during
1982-1985 in Kanshi Ram’s BAMCEF, learnt so many things from
Kanshi Ram, pretended to be his ardent follower and later turned
so snobbish that he used to have a claim of grooming Kanshi Ram
and his movement.
SPLITTING KANSHI RAM BAMCEF
Later in 1986, with a group of supporters in Maharashtra and at
the behest of the Congress, he split Kanshi Ram’s BAMCEF
and got his faction registered. We who worked with Kanshi Ram felt
that it was a heinous betrayal of not only Kanshi Ram but of Ambedkarite
movement which Maharashtrians are famous for. After reading Brother
Gurnam’s write-up, a very pertinent question cropped up:
how the BAMCEF, factionalised by the Brahminical Congress, would
strengthen Ambedkarism and fight Brahminism? This BAMCEF faction
still appears to be on the payroll of Brahminical people.
A PAN-INDIAN NON-POLITICAL MOVEMENT
As Waman Meshram claims to have started a non-political Ambedkarite
movement, let us remember that he has done so by breaking BAMCEF
into several factions after kicking out people who initially supported
him and all these kicked out people run their own BAMCEF factions
in Maharashtra. And let us remember that all these worthies have
not added anything new other than what Kanshi Ram taught.
They have, very cunningly, hijacked the name BAMCEF along with
Kanshi Ram’s ideology and now masquerade as all-India leaders
or even international leaders.
Educated and semi-educated Maharashtrians suffer from leadership
mania, though — they know — they do not possess leadership
qualities. That is why they break popular organisations, hijack
the name and ideology and sit at the center of their faction like
a proud spider sits at the center of its web to victimise smaller
insects.
R.P.I. FATE
That is what they have done with RPI and that is what Waman Meshram
and his ilk have done to BAMCEF. If these worthies feel that they
really possess leadership qualities, they should start new and
fresh organisations instead of stealing names of organisations
founded by somebody.
INVITATION TO POLITICIANS
If we scan the functions organized by Waman Meshram’s BAMCEF,
we cannot but find that in majority of his functions some or other
political leader is invited.
The question is why politicians of different hues adorn
the dias of BAMCEF which claims to have devoted itself to non-political
activities?
And, moreover, what non-political institutions have been established
and run by Waman Meshram’s BAMCEF other than holding conferences
and seminars since 1986? He often speaks of strengthening non-political
roots of Bahujan Samaj. Fine. But which non-political roots of
BAMCEF he has strengthened?
RAT MADE INTO TIGER
The very concept of non-political roots has been borrowed by him
from Kanshi Ram. But this very concept has been used by him to
spread misunderstanding about Kanshi Ram’s movement. When
BSP was founded by Kanshi Ram in 1984 and was spreading its base
with the help of BAMCEF and DS4, these very people published hand-
outs in 1986 saying: “Kanshi Ram was a rat but we made him
a tiger”. They also wrote: “Kanshi Ram was incapable
of providing leadership because he had lost his mental balance”.
BREAKING THE EGG
We were so shocked by this handout that we actually sent some
people to confirm Kanshi Ram’s mental health to Nagpur where
he was going to address a rally. But these very people go on inviting
political leaders in their functions and nobody asks them the reason.
Are these political leaders their mentors?
In fact, after Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar the political, non-political
question has been drawn out of proportion and converted into a
controversy unending such as “the egg first or the hen first”.
The controversy has taken a dangerous dimension such as “whether
to break the egg, from the little end or the big end.” Whichever
end you break the egg the effect will be the same. Dr. Babasaheb
Ambedkar ran political, social and cultural movements simultaneously
to co-ordinate them with each other without making them water-tight
compartments.
Ever since I became a DV family member, I have known that DV always
supports and admires the honest, intelligent and those who believe
in social dynamics. But not those who have betrayed Ambedkarite
movement in any form. And I sincerely feel that DV itself is a
non-political movement devoted to theorizing, conceptualizing and
awakening thousands of simple Ambedkarites in India and abroad.
I also feel that Waman Meshram intends to have coverage for his
self-styled leadership in DV through brother Gurnam Singh Muktsar.
I am well aware of the intellectual level of Meshram as he has
worked with us for quite some years at Nanded. After breaking away
from Kanshi Ram’s BAMCEF, he has tried his best to wean us
away from Kanshi Ram’s movement. But we at Nanded still support
wholeheartedly Mayawati and BSP movement which has been making
strides throughout India.
As a DV family member I don’t want either VTR or Brother
Gurnam Singh to be misled by those who have intentionally betrayed
Ambedkarite movement. If propped up, Meshram might even claim that
he had groomed even VTR and Gurnam Singh Muktsar.
***************
DV & BAMCEF
Many people came to us and tried to win over in the past 28
years of DV. The most powerful bid to purchase us came from those
on the payroll of the Vipassana Viper Goenka.
There were some more. But none could succeed. We don’t
know if Brother Gurnam made the offer after consulting Brother
Waman Meshram. Our stand is DV is ready to go to the other end
of the earth and join hands with even the Devil to fight and
finish Brahminism, India’s principal enemy (contradiction).
The ball is in Brother Waman’s court — EDITOR.
|