Are we in a position to start a Dalit daily
paper ?
V.T. RAJSHEKAR
Brother Gama Ram is the senior-most Dalit member of
the DV family in Lucknow and a highly respected and well-read person.
But as regards
media is concerned he is a stranger. Media in India is a total
monopoly of the manuwadis. Since you can manipulate the minds, the
manuwadis
will never give up its control. Even if you have the money, you
can't run a periodical for long. Starting journal is easy but continuing
it without a break is almost impossible. Miracle of D V: How many
Dalit
journals took birth and died after we started DV in 1981. That
we
in DV did it for 25 years without a single break is a miracle.
This was
possible because of our single-minded devotion and by converting
our blood into sweat. DV is a new experiment in Indian journalism.
But
DV is only a fortnightly. A weekly is more difficult and a daily
is impossible. The Samrat experiment in Bombay is an exception.
It is
just an year old. We have to watch how it will cross the hurdles.
Every effort has been made to close down DV and finish the Editor
himself.
But somehow both survived. This is yet another miracle.
Brother
Kanshi Ram started a "Media Centre" in Delhi and he took
us and showed his great achievements. But we had given him our
warning. He did not listen and as predicted his "Media Centre" never
saw the light of the day.
The problems are too many. From the
very beginning, the Bahujans never gave importance to intellectual
pursuits.
Brahmins no doubt never allowed them to enter the intellectual
field. They asked the Bahujans to keep their brains in the Brahmin
fridge.
And we obediently did it. The Brahmins did their job. But was
it in our interest to keep off the intellectual field? Our people
were encouraged
to run after power and property to some extent. Reservations
helped
to acquire both. In this race we forgot the intellectual work.
We
had met every important person among the SC/BCs and Muslim/Christian/Sikhs
and talked about the "Media Centre". They all liked
the idea but did nothing more than appreciating us. This is
because media is
an intellectual exercise and anything intellectual does not
enter their brains which are so much rusted because of the
Brahminical
corrosion.
We got exasperated and gave up talking about it.
All DV references
to "Media Centre" are cited below to place the facts
before our DV family. We are simply fed up.
In the recent Parliament
election,
the Manuwadi media played havoc (DV Edit June 1, 2004) and
everybody complained against it. Once the elections are over
and the BJP
was defeated all the victims of this media menace coolly forgot
about
it. Now that Brother Gurnam Singh and his admirers like Gama
Ram and a
host of others have raised the issue, we are coming out with
the following facts.
We Lack NewsAgents: A daily paper is not
a joke.
It is a daily
headache. We may have the money and produce the best of a daily
paper. But have we the network to sell the paper? The entire
lot of newsagents
all over the country belong mostly to the urban-based upper
castes who will never, ever sell our paper. They will do everything
to scuttle us.
That means we must create our own newsagents.
In 25
years of
DV, despite our best efforts and country-wide circulation,
we
could not
get reliable newsagents who are prompt in paying (except a
few here and there).
The equally big problem is the network
of correspondents.
The existing news agencies like PTI-UNI are Manuwadi. We can't
use
the Manuwadi stuff in our paper. That means we must have correspondents
at all state headquarters. Are we in a position to pay them?
Even if we are in a position to pay them, how to prevent the
Brahminical
people
purchasing them? When we can't use the Brahminical PTI-UNI
news agencies and don't have our own correspondents, how to
run a
daily?
Income
Tax Problem: The biggest problem is that the Dalit-Bahujans
have not produced
journalists because we never gave importance to this profession.
We don't have a single journalist training college. That means
we must
have our own journalists training center. A couple of journalists
we have produced have been purchased by the Brahminical forces
and they
are employed to fight us only. Then there is yet another problem.
The money. Once it starts coming and somebody is in charge
of it, the Brahminical
forces will direct the Brahmins in Income tax to pounce upon
us. Property leads to dispute. Kanshi Ram got into trouble
with IT
people and hence
he could not open his "Media Centre".
Then we have
the most serious problem of Contradictions. The Indian social
setup
is a beehive
of Contradictions. Under the Brahminical propaganda, the Dalit-Bahujans
have not yet identified the principal enemy of the Bahujans.
Dr. Ambedkar had identified our Enemy No.1: Brahminism. But
we are
busy fighting
between ourselves on this very issue. In Gujarat, the Manuwadis
made use of the Dalits and Tribals to kill Muslims. Earlier,
they did
it to demolish Babri Masjid. Some elite Dalits are saying the
Backward Castes are No.1 enemy and not the Brahmins. In Punjab
some Dalits
are
saying the Jat Sikhs are our Enemy No.1. The vaidiks have managed
to make our own Dalits cut the other Dalit's throat. In Maharashtra,
they
took objection to the Dalit support to Marathas. Once we start
our daily, this problem of Contradictions will crop up and
break up the
paper itself.
We are bringing all these facts because Brother
Gurnam Singh and others should give it serious thought. Because
once we
start we should never fail. DV has never failed. Failure is
not in our dictionary.
If we should not meet with failure then we must have top brains.
Do we have such "brains"? When we have not even learnt
to read, write and speak English, are we in a position to launch
such a media
and then sustain it?
All these questions need answers. Weekly
Paper to Begin with: However, there is a way-out. If (but
this is a big
IF) the money comes, then instead of going for a daily we
can convert the
existing fortnightly Dalit Voice into a weekly.. This itself
is a big job. After running the weekly for an year or so
we can slowly
go in
for a daily. Our formidable and ever-vigilant enemies surrounding
us, we have to be extremely cautious and proceed step by
step. But
before
doing all this we must first have the money. Will our people
give? The mutual suspicion is so much. Dalits having been
deceived by
the upper castes and also by fellow Dalits, they have naturally
become
suspicious. That is why we are very much hesitating to go
into this. In the past 25 years, we did not face any charge. But
if we go slow
and steady, we can win any war. Climb any mountain. Having
fought for 25-long years we feel that from weekly to daily
we can complete
the
job in 5-6 years. ________________________________________________________________
A Dalit daily paper
Gama Ram, A-2/4, Paper Mill Colony, Nishat
Ganj, Lucknow - 226 005
As suggested by Prof. Gurnam Singh Muktsar
(DV
July 16, 2004 (p. 12), I sent you Rs. 1,000 on July 31. A few years
back
I suggested that if 1 lakh Dalits/BCs/minorities regularly contribute
Rs. 100 a month then we will have Rs. 1 crore a month and Rs. 12
crores annually. This will easily help our Editor to start a daily
even if
the newspaper does not receive a single ad. Once we decide to contribute
our share we can strengthen the hands of our Editor to carry on
his revolutionary movement successfully against the BSO and thereby
liberate
the downtrodden masses. I contributed Rs. 100 p.m. for over two
years and then stopped. A call should be given for such a contribution
every month.
___________________________________________________________________
BSP
catapults to centre-stage & becomes only party of tomorrow's
India Dinesh Rajbhar
B/6 - Shalimar Apt., Vakola Police
Station Road, Santacruz (E), Bombay - 400 055
Keeping herself out
from
the prime
ministership, Congress president Sonia Gandhi has defused the foreigner
issue of the Hindu nazi party RSS and its kitten, BJP. Because
of this nazi opposition, Sonia has now become super prime minister.
Samajwadi
Party of Mulayam Singh is enjoying power in UP, with the unsaid
support
of BJP. Of course, BJP-Congress are like father like son for the
Bahujan Samaj. However, BSP chief Mayawati has declared support
to the Congress-led
govt. This is the right time to analyse the post-poll situation
in the context of Ambedkarite movement and Bahujan Samaj.
The 14th
Lok
Sabha elections have shown that the national leadership of the
Bahujan Samaj and Ambedkarite movement is firmly with the BSP only.
Party
with no alliance: In this elections, BSP had the credit of contesting
the
highest number of seats among all the parties (national and state).
Among the national parties, the Congress, BJP, CPM, CPI and NCP
contested 417, 364, 69, 34 and 32 seats respectively. Trying to
be "national",
the Samajwadi Party also contested 237 seats. But BSP contested
435 seats. In UP (all 80), Maharashtra (46 out of 48), Bihar (36),
MP
(28), Rajasthan (24), Gujarat (20), Jhakrhand (14), Punjab (13),
Orissa (12),
Chattisgarh (11), Haryana (10), Delhi (7), Himachal (7), J&K
(3), Uttaranchal (3), TN(30), AP (14), Karnataka (9), Andaman Nicobar,
DNH,
Daman Diu, Pondichery and Chandigarh. BSP contested in 25 states
including 5 union territories. The Congress, BJP, CPM, CPI, NCP,
SP all had alliances
with other parties. But BSP was the only party which had no alliance
with any political party or corporate house.
Both BJP and Congress
are financed by big business houses. So also SP. Yet BSP improved
its strength because of its alliance with the Bahujan Samaj. Is
this not
great? It is India's first party of Phule-Shahu-Periyar-Ambedkar
ideology to contest the highest number of seats and also leave
behind the Manuvadi
parties.
Sharing & caring: Among the 435 candidates of BSP,
169 (SC), 135 (OBC), 41 (ST), 63 (minorities), and 29 from the
upper
castes. Among the 63 minorities, 56 Muslims, 3 Sikhs, 3 Christian,
1 Jain.
No party has given such a universal representation to minorities,
OBCs, STs and SCs. In the history of Indian politics this is a
great achievement
proving that only the BSP is the party which believes in sharing
power. In other words, BSP not only talks of sharing and caring
but proved
it in the distribution of party tickets. Of 19 MPs of BSP, 9 are
OBCs including 3 Most Backward, 5 SCs, 4 Muslims. Other than the
18 MPs
from the Bahujan Samaj, one is a Brahmin. That means BSP got full
support from all castes. State-wise voting share of the BSP clearly
shows the
presence and importance of BSP in the mainstream of Indian politics.
UP is the "neck" of Indian politics and here BSP is a
front-ranking force. In 1999 the undivided UP had given 22.08%
vote to BSP and
14 seats. At present (in 2004) after the partition of UP, BSP got
24.96%
vote and 19 MP seats in UP and 6.77% vote in Uttaranchal. Paswan
humbled: Not only UP, even in the nearby state also BSP's progress
is good.
In Bihar, the RJD-Congress-Lok Jansakti alliance was strong, still
BSP improved its position. In the 1999 election, BSP got just 0.95%
but in this election BSP got 4.05% in Bihar and 2.35% vote in Jharkhand.
RJD is Yadav-based, Lok Jansakti is Dalit-based. The rivals untied
with the Congress not only to defeat NDA but also stop the march
of BSP in Bihar. Even then the BSP tripled its vote in Bihar.
Paswan
is
called Thakur ka thappa but he is way behind BSP. R.P.I. Rejected:
In Maharashtra, BSP has emerged as a third force and the Congress
suffered a heart attack. Paswan, defeated in his home state Bihar,
is running
away to Maharashtra on the direction of the Congress to improve
the heart beat of the Congress and divide the BSP. By electing
BSP to
local bodies, the Maharashtra Dalits are getting closer to BSP.
RPI stands
rejected. It is now clear that Paswan-type leaders can never succeed
in devitalizing the Baba's Elephant. In Maharashtra BSP got 3.06%
votes, giving a big shock to the Congress-NCP and its RPI allies.
The Congress
lost 11 Lok Sabha seats. Even the Dalit wife of a Dalit Chief Minister
lost her seat from Sholapur by 5,798 votes because the BSP candidate
took away 12,067 votes.
The clear-cut message is that the the Maharashtra
Ambedkarites have finally rejected the RPI and understood the importance
of Bahujan unity assured through BSP. In Gujarat, BSP made its
entry by breaking the two-party politics between the Congress and
BJP and
emerged as a third force and secured 1.47% votes. Because of BSP,
the Congress lost Vadodara, Porbander, Bharuch. Even the BJP lost
Banashkant,
Jamnagar, Mehsana, Chota Udaypur (ST) seats. Traitors to Ambedkarism:
The growing power of the Bahujans is killing all upper caste parties
and also Dalit traitors. BSP bulldozer is levelling the uneven
land that is Bharat. Similarly in Punjab 7.67%, Haryana 4.98%,
Delhi 2.48%,
Rajasthan 3.16%, MP 4.75%, Chattisgarh 4.59%, J&K 3.06%, Orissa
3.72% votes. In the South, BSP contested for the first in AP and
won one Assembly seat. In Karnataka, its performance is good. No
sonia
magic in UP: BSP secured 19 Lok Sabha seats in UP with 5.3% votes.
In the last election, it had 14 seats with 4.17% votes Ñ an
increase of 5 seats and 1.13% vote. The Congress formed the govt.
in the Centre, the seat-sharing of Congress increased by 31 seats
but
its vote sharing decreased by 1.5%. Similarly BJP has lost its
vote by about 1% and lost 43 seats. That means BJP lost both seats
and
also votes, the Congress gained seats but lost votes. But the BSP
gained
both seats and votes in UP. BJP is the loser.
Those who are "celebrating" the
revival of the Congress must notice its position in UP where it
could not improve its position. On the contrary, it came down.
The magic
of Sonia did not work in UP. In India as a whole, the Congress
got 145 seats, just 7 seats more than the BJP''s 138. That means
the
Congress and BJP are equal. BSP with its deep ideological foundations
has proved
itself to be a powerful socio-political force. All other parties
have failed to inspire the confidence of the weaker sections, that
is Bahujan.
The historic march of BSP proves the urgent need for the unity
of SC/ST/BCs and religious minorities. Muslims must specially note
this.
Absence
of Kanshi Ram: BSP's performance and success is spectacular compared
to other political parties. Due to the health problems, Kanshi
Ram could not participate in the election campaign and the CBI
was persecuting
Mayawati, the only one-star campaigner for BSP. Even facing such
critical situation, BSP has succeeded to capture the national stage,
proving
that it is the only force that leads the Ambedkarite movement on
a national level. So, it is obligatory to the Bahujan Samaj to
be with
the BSP only Ñ if not as an activist but at least as a voter
and sympathizer.
___________________________________________________
Dalits did Tata
Indica
Dr. K. Jamanadas
Chandrapur - 442 402
A Dalit engineer
did the Tata Indica engine. According to the Lokmat
(Marathi
daily Aug.8, 2004), former Deputy Chief Minister and leader
of NCP, Chagan Bhujbal, addressing an OBC conference at Nagpur,
demanded reservation in private sector for SC/ST/BCs and other
marginalized people including
14% reservation to savarnas and withdrawal of "creamy
layer" condition
for the OBCs. He asked for 52% reservation for OBCs instead
of the 27%. Bhujbal said the upper castes should not think
they were
the
only ones with "merit".
The engine of the Tata's
Indica car was designed by a Dalit engineer staying in the
Mahatma Phule
slum at Nashik
and the body was also designed by a Dalit. We should locate
the concerned persons in Tatas and honor them, he said.
Budha & Babasaheb
on "caste
identity"
Er. R.S. Kataria, 928/24 - Geeta Colony,
Rohtak - 124 001
This is with reference to the seminar held
on "Caste
identity" at
Shimla on 11.7.04 on the last day of the DV readers workshop.
It is believed that there is no caste under Budhism and that
caste
is annihilated
after one becomes Budhist. This is wrong. Not to speak of Budhist
masses, let us see what happens with the bhikhus. (i) A monk
can lead a family
at his own. (ii) If a monk is found guilty he can be shunted
out of bhikhu life by the sangh. If the caste gets annihilated
what
will be
the fate of a person on returning to his family life? In which
caste he will marry as in India no one can survive without
the caste. Budha
is known as Sakya Muni, Sunit is known as Bhangi/sweeper, Uppali
is known as Nai/barber. Are they not all caste or subcaste
names? Sakya
Gana is the ethnic identity of the Budha. In the end, let us
examine what were the Budha's own "Last Words". And
I quote: "Now,
Ananda, whereas the brethren have the habit of calling one
another "friend", Ñ when
I am gone this habit must not be followed. By an elder brother,
Ananda, a brother who is a novice should be called by his name
or clan name
or by word "friend": But by a novice, Ananda, an
elder brother should be addressed as "lord" or "your
reverence".
The above quotation is from Dr. Ambedkar Writings & Speeches
Vol.11, Book VII, Part-III, first edition, p. 551-552. Here,
the clan name
is either gotra or the subcaste. The above quotation from the
Buddha & His
Dhamma written by Babasaheb fully supports our Editor's "caste
identity" thesis. Fascinated by the caste identity thesis,
I am going to organise the Chamars and hold other caste conferences
in Haryana
since I have found it as the best weapon to fight Brahminism.
___________________________________
Anti-national "national" anthem?
B.K.
NAG, VPO SARSARA, BARGARH DT. - 768 028
This refers to the Letter
of Dr. K.S. Bhagavan
with the
Editor's note (DV July 1, 2004 p.18). A series of small articles
were published in DV on "India's anti-national national
anthem".
They are: 1. DV Sept.15, 1992 p.7: "Anti-national national
anthem ?" 2. DV Oct. 1, 1994 p. 22: "Tagore anti-national?" 3.
DV Sept.1, 2001 p.20: "India's national anthem is anti-national
?". The first article was from the Deccan Herald (25.8.1992)
by Lourie Noronha of Bangalore. The English translation of
the "national
anthem" was given to make the readers understand that
the song was composed to please/praise King George V during
his visit
to India.
The second one was a critique of the book, The illegitimacy
of Nationalism (Oxford University Press) of Ashis Nandi,
published in the Times
of India on 4.7.1994. In the third article, Inderpreet Singh
from
the
US narrated the meaning of the "national anthem" in
detail. He also mentioned the English translation of stanza
1 to 5 of the
same song by Tagore. Till I read this article, I was thinking
that the "national
anthem" had only one stanza, but after reading the article
of Brother Singh, I was convinced that it was written only
to praise King George V. Not only DV, some other writers
have also quoted
this.
Swami
Muktananda Sarswati, a prominent Manuwadi, has quoted this
in his Hindi book Sambidhan (p.30). If Brother Bhagavan is
interested
I can supply
a photocopy. |