Supreme Court turning into "Modern Manu"
IQBAL AHMED SHARIFF, ADVOCATE,
94/1- 11th CROSS, TANK GARDEN, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 011

The latest judgment of the Supreme Court on the rights of private educational institutions to be their own masters in selection and admission of students has raised a controversy greater than the one on Shah Banu. There have been vehement opposition on many court judgments like those on appointment of Dalits as temple priests, reservation for Backward Castes, weightage mark for village people, job quotas of Muslims. In all these cases the losers were the over 85% of Indians - Dalits, BCs and minorities.

In all these cases, the vast majority of the elected representatives, state-wise and all India-wise, supported the people against the judiciary. In this latest judgment, the victims are those other than the upper castes, capitalists and education merchants. The reaction has been the greatest by the people's representatives. The counter reaction by the Chief Justice of India was also the greatest bringing out the words - "close down the courts" from his mouth.

This has brought India to the biggest crossroad of history - confrontation between the people and a few self-proclaimed "super brains" of the highest judiciary - and this requires to be properly tackled -may be by amending the Constitution and defining the limits of judiciary.

Ever since the Emergency there has been a gradual change in the attitude of the higher judiciary. Immediately after the Emergency there was panic in the judiciary and later over-zealous assertion in the form of cases already cited above. These judgments were hailed by the Brahminical media, and the judiciary started feeling that it can go extra-judicial and enter into political and public domain. Judges started attending public functions and hearing grievances of the "public" as placed by rich anti-social NGOs like environmentalists, animal rightists, feminists.

This gave rise to the greatest anti-people judicial intervention in the name of public interest litigation (PIL) and judicial dictates were issued. It did not strike the judiciary's mind as to why there are elected bodies like the parliament and state legislatures, the members of which go into every street and home at least once in five years, receive the public praise and also brick-bats through the votes. Their doers are kept open at least for a few hours every day for the public to meet. They are the receivers and redressers of public grievances. They see, meet and talk to thousands of public and their social workers. They are the best judges to know as to what is in public interest or not. And since public comprises the rich, over-rich and poor, intellectuals and ignorant, upper caste, Backward Castes, majority and minority- people of different creeds and sexes-they only can judge what is in the best interest of the people. Again, they are controlled and controverted by others like them in the elected bodies, and after long discussions they resolve as to what is in the best interest of the people and act.

How do the judges of the higher judiciary and particularly of the Supreme Court fit into the capacity of knowing public interest?

The Supreme Court judges have no connection with the public, not even litigants. They come from the High Courts and high court judges are mostly selected from among the high court advocates, most of whom do not even see their clients (the minimum of public) as the High Courts are courts of records and not of trial. High Court advocates are provided with briefs by trial court advocates in appeal cases from different and distant places. It is only on the original jurisdiction side, that litigants meet the high court lawyers and the cases on this side are few.

Thus, most of the High Court judges and almost all judges of the Supreme Court do not see and talk even to the litigants. Then what do they know of the public and of what is in public interest? They must limit their judicial functioning to only those matters where litigants have personal interests. The judicial functioning in the higher judiciary is like post-mortem surgery, scanning of files and books.

The minimum that could be done in PIL was to compel the PIL petition to issue notice to the entire public of India by publishing the PIL petition in newspapers all over India and in all languages so that others could also participate and give their versions. This is the minimum on the universally accepted legal principle - Audi Alterem Partem (hear the other party), and since it is PIL, the other party is the entire public-that is all Indians. Why the judiciary has not done this minimum? Can some govt. officers on the otherwise be the "public"? This is a paradox. This has created a set of PIL lawyers who have even received accolades from some of the judges. Some judges and PIL lawyers have assumed for themselves an extra constitution authority which the founding fathers of the constitution did not anticipate.

This calls for a reform of the judicial functioning. A kind of judicial dictatorship is coming about in India. If not checked it may result in people losing all faith in the Supreme Court and people may say - "Fine, close down the Supreme Court. It is a luxury of a few rich appellants in PIL petitioners".

Apart from these, there is another cause of trouble for the vast majority of Indians comprising Dalits, BCs and minorities. This is the exercise of the right of "equity and good conscience" on the part of the higher judiciary. While the trial courts and trial judges (contemptuously called "subordinate judiciary" by the "higher" judges) go only by law, the high court judges take for themselves another additional right of "equity jurisdiction", and the Supreme Court judges assume for themselves yet another "good conscience": that is, law plus equity plus good conscience. Equity is something beyond law to meet the ends of justice the principles of which are universally well established. This too affects only the litigants. It is very ancient and well defined. King Solomon ordered for the dividing of the child into two halves to be given to each of the claiming mothers on the basis of equity, as the result was expected that the real mother would forgo her half and give over the full to the other and real mother found out. This was a method of doing justice on equity.

Emperor Jehangir also gave the bow and arrow to the aggrieved wife of the slain washerman to shoot and kill him and stood before her to make Noor Jahan also a widow. He knew well that the washerwoman would not do so and accept damages instead, as the killing was accidental. Since she had approached the highest court, the king's court, the court of equity, she was treated equitably under the equity jurisdiction and not under law. Equity is a very ancient concept to meet the needs of justice by going beyond the law. But this applies only to litigants.

But the concept of "good conscience", which is the ruling monarch of highest justicing where public interest is involved, particularly in PIL, is undefined and has no limits. In countries like England, France, Pakistan and Egypt "good conscience" may play a good role in certain matters but it is a menace in India because in other countries, judges and the public, as members of the same race, religion and morals have a more or less common conscience. The source of their conscience-building is the same - sacred books, philosophy, history.

But in India the situation is different because of differences of castes, communities, religions, philosophies, beliefs and so on. One belonging to each of these has a different conscience. An adherent of Manu has a different conscience than its opponent.

The Brahmin's conscience is directly opposed to the conscience of Dalits, Christians and Muslims. The pains and pangs of Dalits, BCs, Muslims - physical, moral, psychological-cannot be understood by an upper caste, born and brought up in vaidik atmosphere and in particular in the present days where there is an anti-Indian RSS which prunes and sharpens such conscience on a daily basis.

It is this conscience which works behind some of the judgments of the Supreme Court, like in the Shah Banu case, the holding of the Assam Immigrants Act and the latest verdict giving all powers to money-making private educational institutions.

In spite of the earth-shaking upheaval by the Muslims on the Shah Banu judgment in which even a warning was given that Common Civil Code (CCC) will be upon the dead bodies of Muslims and it will shatter India into pieces, the Supreme Court again recommended CCC in a later judgment, knowing full well that this is an agenda of an anti-Muslim movement (RSS) and its political wing (BJP).

In spite of this, in a judgment the Supreme Court again had the temerity to harp on the CCC. It forgot that the BJP itself after coming to power gave it up in public interest because it came to know that politics is the art of adjustment with various forces inside and outside the country.

The Supreme Court struck down the Assam Illegal Immigrants Act 1983 after 20 years of its enactment to deprive the Assam Muslims of their right of citizenship, to be expelled from India merely on somebody's saying. This judgment was hailed by the Hindu nazis. The Supreme Court took upon itself the burden of political decisions which may result in mass bloodshed, unsettling the lives of lakhs of Indian Muslims upon the seeking of an anti-Muslim lawyer- petitioner.

The Supreme Court also made undesirable statement on the Shariat courts maintained by Muslims - meaning that parallel justicing is not permissible. It ignored the existence of parallel judicial institutions like court martial, departmental inquiries, domestic inquiries, arbitrations, compromises. It even forgot that Medical Councils and bar councils have their own disciplinary committees and proceedings which impose penalties. Nay. It forgot that the higher judiciary itself has its own disciplinary committees which pass judgements on the misconduct of judges and punishes them.

It forgot that nobody can be compelled to go to court only to seek redressal. Everyone has a right to waive off his rights. As soon as the Supreme Court comes to know of something connected with Islam and Muslims, it loses its head and jumps to uncalled for conclusions.

In the same vain the Supreme Court said that the object of the minority commissions is to slowly amalgamate the minorities into a single group.

Whose language is the Supreme Court using? From where the judges and particularly the chief justices are getting inspiration? This leads to the suspicion that Hindu nazi RSS elements wait for decades to come to the post of chief justice of India and propagate RSS ideals to overtly pour venom on Muslims and covertly on BCs and Dalits.

They put these ideals on record and pass it on to thousands of judges and lakhs of lawyers all over India. Some chief justices have openly acted as RSS ideologues and propagandists.

The confidence of the Muslims in the Supreme Court is gradually eroding and a time may come when Muslims may demand that Hindu judges of the Supreme Court should not sit upon matters connected with Muslim affairs.

Now, through this latest judgment, the Supreme Court has acted as "Modern Manu" to deprive the government of its rights to do social justice, which will affect 85% of Indians. No time the Supreme Court has taken into account the running away of "merited" upper castes to Western countries (brain drain) to serve themselves and those countries after getting degrees in India free of costs. Now their children are provided facilities in the NRI quota at fees far cheaper than those in the countries of their migration - a loot at the expense of BCs and minorities.

What is happening is that every time the higher judiciary commits such anti-Dalit/BC/minority acts and we do not even protest out of fear of the court. Laws are made that are held wrong. Such type of situation does not exist in other countries. It is only in India. This is because the "good conscience" of the highest judges is different from that of the people. This conscience disparity requires to be removed early.

And this is possible only by putting those with the conscience of Dalits/BC and minorities into the position of higher justicing. And this is possible only by providing reservations in higher judiciary as they only know where the shoe pinches just as the upper caste judges know where their shoe pinches. Social justice has to be first brought about in institutions of justice. In this matter we are supported by past experience. At the dawn of "independence" the entire executive was full of upper castes. Slowly through reservation, Dalits and BCs also entered and they are now in substantial numbers. By remaining in constant touch with them in the office and institutions, the upper caste officials also got educated on social justice. One individual's neighbourhood teaches more than hundreds of books.

If Dalit and BC judges are allowed to sit on the benches of higher judiciary, not only there will be check on anti - Dalit/BC/minorities judgments, but also the upper caste judges will learn lessons on social justice apart from legal and technical justice. Reservation is not just a means of livelihood and status but of creating and promoting national integration.

Lack of reservations in higher judiciary is the main cause for these anti-social judgments.

To sum up, the time has come for India to bring about the following changes in the Constitution:

1. The number of judges in all courts must be increased.

2. Reservations to Dalits/BCs and minorities should be provided in higher judiciary so that at no time the proportion of upper castes goes beyond 50%.

3. Selection of the judges of higher judiciary should be done by committees, which should also collect information about the ideological and social background of the candidates.

4. Article 32 (2) conferring right upon the Supreme Court to issue directions, orders, writs must be deleted. (Original jurisdiction). Enough that the High Courts have it under Art.226. Supreme Court should exercise only appellate jurisdiction, that too limited only to the litigants. Sermonising, suggesting and inferring from out of records must be prohibited for the courts of records.

5. Articles 124 (3) and 217 (2) should be so amended to see that the higher judges have a practice of at least 10 years in the trial courts, so that they may know litigants, witnesses and the public directly from observation and contacts.

The Supreme Court should of its own come forward for these changes as otherwise people will be compelled to demonstrate before the Supreme Court.

DV REFERENCE:-

DV April 16, 2005 p.4: "Upper castes using judiciary to weaken legislature".

DV Dec.1, 2004 p.5: "Amend Constitution to keep courts out of SC/ST quota".

DV Sept.1, 2003 p.5: "Judiciar is neither honest nor accountable".

DV Edit Aug.16, 2003: "CMV syndrome afflicts vaidik judges: Their only worry is common civil code - not social justice".

DV March 1, 2003 p.8: "Vaidik media bid to malign Karnataka BC judges".

DV Feb.1, 2003 p.10: "Apex Court bid to curb Muslim education".

DV Oct.1, 2002 p. 17: "Supreme Court finds nothing wrong with Brahminism".

DV May 16, 2002 p.11: "Govt. rejects quota for Dalits in higher judiciary" & "Chanakya's acquittal in corruption case".

DV May 1, 2002 p.15: "Babri Masjid: How foolish Muslims can be to trust a pro-Hindu judiciary?"

DV March 16, 2002 p. 7: "How to end judicial corruption".

DV Feb.1, 2002 p.4: "Parliament must stop Supreme Court from meddling with will of people" & p.7: "Unjust Hindu judges warned".

DV Dec.1, 2001 p.19: "Anti-Dalit Chief Justice retires".

DV Nov.1, 2000 p. 5: "Racism in judiciary".

DV Sept.16, 2000 p. 7: "Supreme Court practising racism".

Edit Oct.16, 1999: "DV declares war on judicial terrorism: anti-people Supreme Court".

DV Oct.16, 1999 p.5: "How dare Supreme Court say quota in PG medicine is anti-national", Dr. K.C. Yadav, and p.7: "To say Dalit doctors have no merit is clearest case of racism in judiciary", Dr. R.P. Harsh.

DV Oct.1, 1999 p.6: "Dalit protest against Supreme Court".

DV April 16, 1999 p.17: "Judiciary suffering from brahminical prejudices", BAMCEF document.

DV April 1, 1999 p.6: "MPs criticise Supreme Court monopoly".

DV March 16, 1999 p.11: "Dalits furious with Chief Justice Anand".

DV Feb.16, 1999 p.4: "Judiciary sabotaging social justice".

DV Edit Dec.1, 1997: "Democracy in danger because of judicial terrorism on Bahujans".

DV Aug.1, 1995 p.8: "Supreme Court misusing powers to malign Muslims: Beware of manuwadi judges".

COMMUNICATION
Who is enemy of Muslims in India
USMAN KHALID, DIRECTOR, LISA, LONDON

Here is the Indian propaganda line repeated ad-infinitum since 1940. Why can't the Hindu understand that it is not the West -Europe or America -that has been the enemy of Islam or the Muslims in the 20th century? The Muslims see the Brahminic system as the enemy, not just of the Muslims but of all humanity - Muslims, Christians, Sikhs and the Untouchable majority in India. The partition in 1947 helped two-thirds of the Muslims of British India to escape the shackles of Brahmin Samaj that characterizes the social scene of India today. The remaining one-third who lives in India have to carry on their struggle against the most diabolical and the most iniquitous social system on earth - the Hindu caste system.

The Untouchables, who were cajoled into joint electorate with the upper castes (Hindus) in 1932 (Poona Pact) are wide awake now. They are eager to unite all Bahujans including Muslims and Christians and isolate themselves from the poison of Hindu Samaj. They recognize that the 1947 partition brought freedom from Hindu Samaj to 300 million Muslims who enjoy sovereignty in Pakistan and Bangladesh while they are hunted and hounded inside India. Even in Kashmir where they are in majority and have always had a Muslim Chief Minister, wanton bloodshed of Muslims continues. Some Muslims have been bought by Hindus in the past - like Maulana Azad- and more have been bought later. But traitors are not representatives of Muslims, they are just traitors.

_________________________________________________________________________________

HYDERABAD SEMINAR ON SEPT.23
Lack of caste consciousness among SC/BCs
S. SUNDAR, R.NO. N-209, HOSTEL-E, HYDERABAD UNIVERSITY, HYDERABAD - 500 040

Educated and well-off Bahujans (SC/ST/BCs) of India overlook our people's "do or die" situation.

The issue of reservation in private sector and private professional institutions rocks every nook and corner of India but our University of Hyderabad is yet to react. The reason we found here is the lack of caste consciousness and consolidation among the Bahujans in the campus. But the Brahminical toilet papers have already set their propaganda against Bahujans. The Times of India editorial (Aug.22) lauds the Supreme Court's verdict against the reservation in private educational institutions. The Business Line (Aug.11) tries to coax us by asking the Dalits not to fight for the reservation in jobs but ask for the "entrepreneurship" in private sector.

These are Brahminical gimmicks and a con to divert the focus on the Bahujans and a bid to show them as the champions for the cause of deprived.

The caste consolidation of the 3% upper castes usurps the other 97% and proves the urgent need for caste consciousness leading to caste consolidation as proposed by our Editor in his award-winning book on Caste. Ironically the Bahujan students in our University have not woken up even after this open challenge by the Brahminical clan. It is high time for us to consolidate our identities and fight against the oppressive forces to get our rights as envisaged by our Babasaheb. We must remember that besides these present issues there are many long-standing issues but the recipe is one and the same - caste consolidation.

The "marxist" students union in our campus never identified the caste problem and they always try to put it in the back burner. We have nothing to lose but our shackles.

So we, the United Students Forum (USF) of University of Hyderabad, have arranged a seminar on Sept.23 at the Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Auditorium at 3 PM with our Editor, V.T. Rajshekar, Prof. Aloysius, visiting professor, Hyderabad University and Prof. Satyanarayana of Kula Nirmoolan Porata Samiti, Hyderabad. We will invite all DV readers and discerned people to this seminar. (ferrarisundar@yahoo.com).

_________________________________________________________________________________

Of Jews & "Jews of India"
WALTER F. MUELLER, EDITOR: COMMUNITY NEWS, PO BOX - 191677, SACRAMENTO, CA 95819

The alleged Jewish suffering would be just a small smudge in the human history of atrocities. Why are they receiving special treatment? You think that's a stupid question? Unless you go for the usual answers, I don't think it is. It is just really hard to believe sometimes that the whole world is falling for these lies.

What is it that makes the Jews more important than any other race? Because they are the chosen? Or may be because they own all the public relations tools? These are all silly answers. You tell me - and no, I do not want to hear these boring answers. Write me and tell me why you think that is.

Something terrible must have gone wrong when the lives of other races are worth less than that of a small minority, who call themselves the Jews. Isn't that the epitome of racism? (Editorial in his monthly journal of March 2005).

********************

Jews make up less than 3% of American population. So too the "Jews of India" in this country. Both call themselves "heaven born" and "chosen people". Having captured the entire media, both convert lies into supreme truth and make us believe in it. Eviction of a couple of hundreds of Jews, illegally occupying the Palestinian land of Gaza, received worldwide TV live coverage but the more serious suffering of Palestinians was ignored. Both India and America suffer from an identical problem. But the world is ignorant - EDITOR.

D.V. REFERENCE TO JEWS

DV June 1, 2004 p.12: "List of 50 American zionists & Neo-Cons behind murder of Muslims" & p. 13: "US Govt. knew of WTC attack? DV predictions coming true".

DV April 16, 2004 p. 20: "How to kill Brahminism?" p. 22: "Jews & Jews of India: A case of serious mental disorder".

DV Edit March 16, 2004 p.5: "Why Jews & Brahmins complain they alone are so much hated? Sociology of a unique paranoid" & "Gang-up of zionists & Hindu nazis to dominate world". p. 6: "Brahminism & zionism: Two faces of the same coin". p. 10: "Genetic research confirms Aryan invasion theory & origin of castes".

DV Dec.16, 2003 p. 8: "Israel as No. 1 threat to world: DV predictions coming true" & p. 9: "Zionist connection to 9/11".

DV Nov.16, 2003: "DV proves right on Jews".

DV Edit Nov.1, 2003: "Bush, Blair, Sharon must be tried before UN War Crimes Tribunal for killing innocents".

DV Aug.16, 2003 p.5: "How admirers of Hitler can be lovers of Jews?" & p. 23: "Gang up of Jews & Jews of India, "Zionist backing for Aryan nation?"

DV Edit June 16, 2003: "Power of Jews & Jews of India: Those criticising them face disgrace, disaster, even death". & p. 6: "Budding friendship between Hindu nazis & American Jews". p. 8: "Neo-Con zionists hijack America guided by Jews & Brahmins". p. 11: "Jews & Brahmins: common features".

DV April 16, 2003 p.7: "Brahminism can't be cured hence endured?" p. 8: "Jewish origin of Brahmin race: DV Editor's thesis confirmed" & "Why vaidiks & zionists should get angry if DV Editor is wrong?"

DV Oct.16, 2002 p.4: "Who is real enemy of America?" & "Yet another wornder of the world", & p. 5: "Nest of zionist spies within US Govt.".

DV Sept.16, 2002 p.11: "Jewish origin of Chitpavan Brahmins & "DV proves right on Jews of India".

DV Edit April 1, 2001: "Untouchability, Indian brand of racism, hits international heights at Delhi global conference".

DV Sept.16, 1999 p.4: "Why should Jews align with killer Aryans?"

DV Sept.1, 1999 p. 19: "Both Jews & Dalits are victims of Aryan hate philosophy".

DV Edit April 16, 1999: "German nazis yesterday killed Jews but "Jews of India today turn into Hindu nazis & votaries of zionism".

DV Jan.16, 1999 p.9: "Racism originated in India: Aryans are its founding fathers".

DV Jan.16, 1998 p.9: "Jewish scholar who diagnosed disease of brahminism but failed to cure it".

DV Dec.16, 1996 p. 9: "Brahmin as a sociological wonder".

DV May 16, 1995 p.11: "Nitzsche was inspired by Manusmriti, says a Brahmin journalist: Hitler's nazism less dangerous than brahminism".

DV Feb.1, 1995 p.11: "Jewish origin of Chitpavans: Brahminism & zionism".

DV Edit July 1, 1992: "Brahminism - founding father of racism & nazism - is the Enemy No.1 of the whole world".

DV Edit Feb.1, 1992: "Brahminism defeats us not because of its philosophy but its deadly strategy & tactics".

DV Jan.16, 1992 p. 17: "Jews join hands with Jews of India".

V.T.Rajshekar: "Brahminism - Father of Fascism, Racism, Nazism", DSA, 1994.

_________________________________________________________________________________

COMMUNICATION:
Power of English: Dalits lose race
RAJU THOMAS, PO BOX - 2296, MADRAS - 600 023

Very often some Malayalam journals write about you, the DSA and Dalit Voice. We have a few genuine DV family members in Kerala but they don't write to you about it. Is it because they are not aware of such writings? Perhaps our DV family members too have become selfish. The latest advice is we must have money. Otherwise no one will care for you. The advice given is to forget about Dalits.

"You are living in a world of competition and no one will recognize you if you cannot compete. Brahmins believe in strength and efficiency. No more reservation. The age of reservation is gone. What will the Dalits do? Are Dalits aware of the global situation? Do they know world politics?"

Brahmin-dominated IT companies: These are the questions I often face. In the American IT company, in which a relative was working at Hyderabad, had recruited 500 people and he was the only Dalit. Majority Brahmins and one Syrian Christian from Kerala. Where are the Dalits? In which world are they living?

Within 8 months of his joining the company, he recruited 1,250 youths. I tried in four districts in Kerala and failed to get one single Dalit. I could not locate one Dalit candidate because none could speak English.

The power of English language is unimaginable. Who asked the Dalits not to learn English? Most of the Dalits in Kerala, who are govt. servants, are addicted to their mother tongue - Malayalam. They do not have the sense to see that no Syrian Christian, Nair or Brahmin sends his children to the Malayalam schools. Even the Ezhavas, who were once unthinking, are today sending their children to English-medium schools. The Manuwadi marxists in Kerala brainwashed the Dalits and made them addicted to mother tongue.

I do not think our Dalits will see the writings on the wall because, as Dr. Ambedkar said, "there is a kink in their brains". This kink is formed because of Hinduism. Either Dalits must destroy Hinduism (Thus Spake Ambedkar, Vol.2 p.30) or Hinduism will destroy them.

Kerala Dalit intellectuals: What do the Dalits think? Or do they think at all? Where are our "educated" and employed Dalits? Gopal Guru at a seminar said Kerala has not produced one Dalit intellectual. Yes, it is 100% true. We have many educated and employed Dalits, we have a few writers and academicians, we have several Dalit organizations and leaders but we have not produced intellectuals. No hope in the near future also. Each has his own selfish motive.

None comes forward to work as a missionary of the community. Only after retirement some fellows get "vision" for community work like the Pentecostals? There are plenty of missionaries among the Brahmins, Christians, Muslims and even among the Ezhavas. But where are the missionaries among the Dalits?

Marxist menace: Of course, Kerala has produced some effective Dalit writers. But none is more effective than the "Dalit Bandhu" who has proved that he is a historian in the true sense. His writings are very powerful using the DV language. The Hindu nazis in Kerala are angry with him. He says he is not afraid of death.

There is one J. Raghu (Ezhava) whose writings are very powerful but the question is which Dalit will understand such writings. "Dalit Bandhu" says that only Raghu is an upcoming writer. Other Dalit writers will have to get rid of marxism. The marxist injection has gone deep into the very marrow of Dalits.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Mountains of Jewish lies on Hitler & Holocaust

1. THE AUSCHWITZ LIE
Thies Christopher

An eye-witness account of the disinformation hoax created by the Jews. There was neither a gas chamber nor a single Jew was gassed. The total population of Jews was 200,000. But in Dresden (Germany) alone more Germans (6 millions) were killed on one single night in the Second World War than all the Jews killed in all the concentration camps during the Hitler's regime. This is history but the world believes only lies.

1998 - 4th edition

pp.32

price not marked

2. GERMANY MUST PERISH
Theodore N. Kaufman

Calls for the total extermination of the Germans. Reveals how much the Jews hated the Germans.

1999
pp.60
price not marked

Truth At Last
PO Box 12111, Mariette, GA 30061, USA

The first forensic examination of Auschwitz

Foreword by David Irwing

A scientific document by a forensic expert completely refuting the false propaganda about the nazi gas chamber and the Holocaust. Proves how the zionist propaganda agianst German nazis was a bundle of lies and lies.

1988
pp.70
£25

Focal Point
81 - Duke St., London W1M 5DJ

A brave German-American woman's fight against Jewish lies in the American media and schools.

2005
pp.200
Price not marked

Christine B. Miller
666 - Cyrus Ave., Marshfield, WI 54449, USA.

2003
pp.120
$40

Illustrated

Clears the Jewish propaganda lies agianst German nazis and proves the popularity of nazis and Hitler. llustrated

2001
pp.250
$30

USA Inc., Rapid City, PO Box 2600, SD-USA 20001

Photocopy available with DV office.